ArticleRSC advances2021
Estimation of rolling work of adhesion at the nanoscale with soft probing using optical tweezers.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controlled roll rotation of a microparticle in a hydro-thermophoretic trap.Physical review research · 2023Article
- Comparison of thermal and athermal dynamics of the cell membrane slope fluctuations in the presence and absence of Latrunculin-B.Physical biology · 2023Article
- Comparison of translational and rotational modes towards passive rheology of the cytoplasm of MCF-7 cells using optical tweezers.Frontiers in physics · 2023Article
- Article
- Generation of partial roll rotation in a hexagonal NaYFOptics express · 2022Article
- Temporal evolution of viscoelasticity of soft colloid laden air-water interface: a multiple mode microrheology study.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Realization of pitch-rotational torque wrench in two-beam optical tweezers.Journal of physics communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Conventionally, the work of adhesion at the nanoscale is estimated using an atomic force microscope with a tip of the size of 10 nm. It is pressed into a surface with nano-Newton forces and then retracted to ascertain when the tip breaks away from the surface. Thus this ensures "hard probing" of a surface. However there can be another configuration where the particle is barely placed into the surface when the work of adhesion attaches the particle to the surface and this can be called "soft probing". In this configuration, if a birefringent particle is confined in linearly polarized optical tweezers, and then the surface is moved in the direction tangential to the plane, a rolling motion can be induced. Study of this rolling motion can also show the work of adhesion. We use this configuration to find the rolling work of adhesion of a 3 μm diameter birefringent particle on a glass surface. We go on to study the effects of changing the surface to a hydrophobic slippery surface like polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS). Then we go on to show that even 500 nm diameter diamonds bearing nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers which are birefringent due to the stresses on the crystal could also be trapped and rolled to generate pitch (out-of-plane rotation) motion with 50 nm contact diameters. We find that this mode of soft probing yields a work of adhesion of about 1 mJ m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.