Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737844›Full record

ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2021

Phytoantioxidant Functionalized Nanoparticles: A Green Approach to Combat Nanoparticle-Induced Oxidative Stress.

Acharya Balkrishna, Ashwani Kumar, Vedpriya Arya, Akansha Rohela, Rachna Verma, Eugenie Nepovimova, Ondrej Krejcar, Dinesh Kumar, Naveen Thakur, Kamil Kuca

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Acharya BalkrishnaPatanjali Herbal Research Department, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar 249405, India.
Ashwani KumarPatanjali Herbal Research Department, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar 249405, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-3236
Vedpriya AryaPatanjali Herbal Research Department, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar 249405, India.
Akansha RohelaPatanjali Herbal Research Department, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar 249405, India.
Rachna VermaSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-9450
Eugenie NepovimovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic.
Ondrej KrejcarCenter for Basic and Applied Science, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-2574
Dinesh KumarSchool of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, India.
Naveen ThakurDepartment of Physics, Career Point University, Hamirpur 177001, India.
Kamil KucaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-1109
Patanjali Research Foundation · INShoolini University · INCareer Point University · INUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZUniversity of Hradec Králové · CZUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology is gaining significant attention, with numerous biomedical applications. Silver in wound dressings, copper oxide and silver in antibacterial preparations, and zinc oxide nanoparticles as a food and cosmetic ingredient are common examples. However, adverse effects of nanoparticles in humans and the environment from extended exposure at varied concentrations have yet to be established. One of the drawbacks of employing nanoparticles is their tendency to cause oxidative stress, a significant public health concern with life-threatening consequences. Cardiovascular, renal, and respiratory problems and diabetes are among the oxidative stress-related disorders. In this context, phytoantioxidant functionalized nanoparticles could be a novel and effective alternative. In addition to performing their intended function, they can protect against oxidative damage. This review was designed by searching through various websites, books, and articles found in PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. To begin with, oxidative stress, its related diseases, and the mechanistic basis of oxidative damage caused by nanoparticles are discussed. One of the main mechanisms of action of nanoparticles was unearthed to be oxidative stress, which limits their use in humans. Secondly, the role of phytoantioxidant functionalized nanoparticles in oxidative damage prevention is critically discussed. The parameters for the characterization of nanoparticles were also discussed. The majority of silver, gold, iron, zinc oxide, and copper nanoparticles produced utilizing various plant extracts were active free radical scavengers. This potential is linked to several surface fabricated phytoconstituents, such as flavonoids and phenols. These phytoantioxidant functionalized nanoparticles could be a better alternative to nanoparticles prepared by other existing approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsFree Radical ScavengersHumansMetal NanoparticlesOxidative StressPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAntioxidantsFree Radical ScavengersPhytochemicalsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID34737844
PMCPMC8563134
OpenAlexW3208497055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.