Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737772›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2021

[Disruption of health services for pregnant women, newborns, children, adolescents, and women during the COVID-19 pandemic: ISLAC 2020 ProjectInterrupção dos serviços de saúde para grávidas, recém-nascidos, crianças, adolescentes e mulheres durante a pandemia de COVID-19: projeto ISLAC 2020].

Pablo Villalobos Dintrans, Matilde Maddaleno, Yamileth Granizo Román, Paula Valenzuela Delpiano, Arachu Castro, Carina Vance, Claudio A Castillo

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bottom-up innovative responses to COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: addressing deprioritized populations.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo Villalobos DintransUniversidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago Chile Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Matilde MaddalenoUniversidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago Chile Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Yamileth Granizo RománUniversidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago Chile Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paula Valenzuela DelpianoUniversidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago Chile Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Arachu CastroEscuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical Universidad de Tulane Nueva Orleans Estados Unidos de América Escuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical, Universidad de Tulane, Nueva Orleans, Estados Unidos de América.
Carina VanceEscuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical Universidad de Tulane Nueva Orleans Estados Unidos de América Escuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical, Universidad de Tulane, Nueva Orleans, Estados Unidos de América.
Claudio A CastilloEscuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical Universidad de Tulane Nueva Orleans Estados Unidos de América Escuela de Salud Pública y Medicina Tropical, Universidad de Tulane, Nueva Orleans, Estados Unidos de América.
Universidad de Santiago de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDescribe the perceptions of key actors regarding the disruption of health services for populations that ceased to be prioritized because of the COVID-19 pandemic-pregnant women, newborn, children, adolescents, and women-in countries of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) during the first stage of the pandemic.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a 35-question survey was administered to key actors in 19 LAC countries between July and September 2020. The respondents were asked for their personal perceptions regarding the situation of social and health services in their country before and during the pandemic. They were also asked for a projection of the situation during the post-pandemic period.

resultsIn the 691 responses received, the main perception was that coverage in the services analyzed had been high before the pandemic, although their quality was not as highly rated. Both the coverage and quality of services were thought to have declined for adolescents and women. The majority of respondents predicted that all services will continue to function at lower than usual coverage levels for another three months (53.1%) and another 12 months (41.3%). Guaranteeing coverage and access to health services was considered the main policy challenge going forward. The next most needed initiatives noted were financing for actions to support women, children, and adolescents, and protection against violence and promotion of measures to combat it.

conclusionsAlthough the pandemic has struck all countries, its effect on the delivery of services in the populations analyzed differs from country to country and according to the types of service. It is essential to invest in national information systems that will make it possible to monitor the different services and identify the populations that need to be prioritized.

Indexed as

adolescentCaribbean regionchildcoronavirus infectionsHealth servicesLatin Americapregnant womenwomen

Identifiers

PMID34737772
PMCPMC8559667
OpenAlexW3208529462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.