Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737473›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

Performance-based incentives and community health workers' outputs, a systematic review.

Thomas Gadsden, Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Anna Palagyi, Asri Maharani, Sujarwoto Sujarwoto, Michelle Baddeley, Stephen Jan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas GadsdenThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia.
Sikhumbuzo A MabundaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna PalagyiThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia.
Asri MaharaniFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Sujarwoto SujarwotoDepartment of Public Administration, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Michelle BaddeleyUTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Level 5/1 King St, Newtown 2042, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the evidence on the impact on measurable outcomes of performance-based incentives for community health workers (CHWs) in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of intervention studies published before November 2020 that evaluated the impact of financial and non-financial performance-based incentives for CHWs. Outcomes included patient health indicators; quality, utilization or delivery of health-care services; and CHW motivation or satisfaction. We assessed risk of bias for all included studies using the Cochrane tool. We based our narrative synthesis on a framework for measuring the performance of CHW programmes, comprising inputs, processes, performance outputs and health outcomes.

findingsTwo reviewers screened 2811 records; we included 12 studies, 11 of which were randomized controlled trials and one a non-randomized trial. We found that non-financial, publicly displayed recognition of CHWs' efforts was effective in improved service delivery outcomes. While large financial incentives were more effective than small ones in bringing about improved performance, they often resulted in the reallocation of effort away from other, non-incentivized tasks. We found no studies that tested a combined package of financial and non-financial incentives. The rationale for the design of performance-based incentives or explanation of how incentives interacted with contextual factors were rarely reported.

conclusionFinancial performance-based incentives alone can improve CHW service delivery outcomes, but at the risk of unincentivized tasks being neglected. As calls to professionalize CHW programmes gain momentum, research that explores the interactions among different forms of incentives, context and sustainability is needed.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersMotivationDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34737473
PMCPMC8542270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.