Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737471›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

Insights into vaccine hesitancy from systems thinking, Rwanda.

Catherine Decouttere, Stany Banzimana, Pål Davidsen, Carla Van Riet, Corinne Vandermeulen, Elizabeth Mason, Mohammad S Jalali, Nico Vandaele

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Harnessing the power of behavioural science to improve health.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine DecouttereResearch Center for Access-to-Medicines, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Stany BanzimanaEast African Community Regional Centre of Excellence for Vaccines, Immunization and Health Supply Chain Management, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Pål DavidsenSystem Dynamics Group, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Carla Van RietResearch Center for Access-to-Medicines, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Corinne VandermeulenLeuven University Vaccinology Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elizabeth MasonMassachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States of America.
Mohammad S JalaliMassachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States of America.
Nico VandaeleResearch Center for Access-to-Medicines, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
University of Bergen · NOUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate vaccine hesitancy leading to underimmunization and a measles outbreak in Rwanda and to develop a conceptual, community-level model of behavioural factors.

methodsLocal immunization systems in two Rwandan communities (one recently experienced a measles outbreak) were explored using systems thinking, human-centred design and behavioural frameworks. Data were collected between 2018 and 2020 from: discussions with 11 vaccination service providers (i.e. hospital and health centre staff); interviews with 161 children's caregivers at health centres; and nine validation interviews with health centre staff. Factors influencing vaccine hesitancy were categorized using the 3Cs framework: confidence, complacency and convenience. A conceptual model of vaccine hesitancy mechanisms with feedback loops was developed.

findingsA comparison of service providers' and caregivers' perspectives in both rural and peri-urban settings showed that similar factors strengthened vaccine uptake: (i) high trust in vaccines and service providers based on personal relationships with health centre staff; (ii) the connecting role of community health workers; and (iii) a strong sense of community. Factors identified as increasing vaccine hesitancy (e.g. service accessibility and inadequate follow-up) differed between service providers and caregivers and between settings. The conceptual model could be used to explain drivers of the recent measles outbreak and to guide interventions designed to increase vaccine uptake.

conclusionThe application of behavioural frameworks and systems thinking revealed vaccine hesitancy mechanisms in Rwandan communities that demonstrate the interrelationship between immunization services and caregivers' vaccination behaviour. Confidence-building social structures and context-dependent challenges that affect vaccine uptake were also identified.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinesChildHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansRwandaSystems AnalysisVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34737471
PMCPMC8542260
OpenAlexW3208736598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.