Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737371›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli.

Nienke B Debats, Herbert Heuer, Christoph Kayser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nienke B DebatsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. nienke.debats@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6941-949X
Herbert HeuerDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0488-2878
Christoph KayserDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-5704

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KA2661/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To organize the plethora of sensory signals from our environment into a coherent percept, our brain relies on the processes of multisensory integration and sensory recalibration. We here asked how visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration are shaped by the presence of more than one visual stimulus, hence paving the way to study multisensory perception under more naturalistic settings with multiple signals per sensory modality. We used a cursor-control task in which proprioceptive information on the endpoint of a reaching movement was complemented by two visual stimuli providing additional information on the movement endpoint. The visual stimuli were briefly shown, one synchronously with the hand reaching the movement endpoint, the other delayed. In Experiment 1, the judgments of hand movement endpoint revealed integration and recalibration biases oriented towards the position of the synchronous stimulus and away from the delayed one. In Experiment 2 we contrasted two alternative accounts: that only the temporally more proximal visual stimulus enters integration similar to a winner-takes-all process, or that the influences of both stimuli superpose. The proprioceptive biases revealed that integration-and likely also recalibration-are shaped by the superposed contributions of multiple stimuli rather than by only the most powerful individual one.

Indexed as

AdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHandHumansMaleMovementPerceptionPhotic StimulationProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID34737371
PMCPMC8569193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.