Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34736529›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2021

The vaginal microbiota and innate immunity after local excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Anita Mitra, David A MacIntyre, Maria Paraskevaidi, Anna-Barbara Moscicki, Vishakha Mahajan, Ann Smith, Yun S Lee, Deirdre Lyons, Evangelos Paraskevaidis, Julian R Marchesi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anita MitraInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David A MacIntyreInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Maria ParaskevaidiInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Anna-Barbara MoscickiRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Vishakha MahajanInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Ann SmithFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University West of England, Bristol, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.
Yun S LeeInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Deirdre LyonsDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, W120HS, UK.
Evangelos ParaskevaidisDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, W120HS, UK.
Julian R MarchesiDivision of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Phillip R BennettInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Maria KyrgiouInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK. m.kyrgiou@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7165-0735
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal microbiota (VMB) composition is altered in women with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) compared to healthy controls and is associated with disease progression. However, the impact of CIN excision on the VMB and innate immunity is not known. This observational study aims to explore the impact of CIN excision on the VMB, antimicrobial peptides (AMP) and proinflammatory cytokines.

methodsWe sampled 103 non-pregnant, premenopausal women at the time of excisional treatment for CIN and at their 6-month follow-up visit. A further 39 untreated controls with normal cytology were also sampled. We used metataxonomics to group vaginal swab samples into community state types (CSTs) and ELISA to quantify cytokine and AMP levels in matched vaginal secretions. Analyses were performed to compare the bacterial composition and immune analyte levels before and after CIN excision and in healthy controls.

resultsWomen with CIN had significantly higher rates of Lactobacillus species depletion pre-treatment compared to healthy controls (CST IV 21/103, 20% vs 1/39, 3%, p = 0.0081). Excision did not change the VMB composition, with CST IV remaining significantly more prevalent after excision compared to untreated, healthy controls (CST IV 19/103, 20% vs 1/39, 3%, p = 0.0142). Prevotella bivia and Sneathia amnii were significantly higher in samples before treatment compared to untreated controls, and Prevotella bivia remained significantly higher amongst the treated, with less Lactobacillus crispatus compared to untreated controls. IL-1β and IL-8 remained significantly elevated pre- (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0014, respectively) and post-treatment (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0035, respectively) compared to untreated controls. Levels of human beta-defensin-1 and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor were both significantly reduced following CIN excision (p < 0.0001); however, their levels remained lower than controls post-treatment.

conclusionsWomen with CIN have an increased prevalence of Lactobacillus sp. depletion, high-diversity VMB composition, and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines and AMPs compared to normal controls. Surgical excision of the disease reduces levels of vaginal AMPs but does not alter VMB composition or cytokine levels. These findings suggest that women with CIN have an inherent predisposition to a high-diversity proinflammatory environment that is not corrected by disease excision. The failure to re-establish a Lactobacillus-enriched CST may explain why women remain at high risk of pre-invasive and invasive disease recurrence.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateMicrobiotaAntimicrobial PeptidesDisease ProgressionFemaleGenotypeHumansLactobacillusPrevotellaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginaAntimicrobial PeptidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaLactobacillusMetataxonomicsMucosal immunityVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID34736529
PMCPMC8567681
OpenAlexW3121097551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.