Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34736372›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Two years of on-site influenza vaccination strategy in an Italian university hospital: main results and lessons learned.

Francesco Paolo Bianchi, Silvio Tafuri, Giuseppe Spinelli, Matilde Carlucci, Giovanni Migliore, Giuseppe Calabrese, Antonio Daleno, Livio Melpignano, Luigi Vimercati, Pasquale Stefanizzi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Paolo BianchiDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Silvio TafuriDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe SpinelliDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Matilde CarlucciHospital Direction, Bari Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Giovanni MiglioreHospital Direction, Bari Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe CalabreseHospital Direction, Bari Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Antonio DalenoHospital Direction, Bari Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Livio MelpignanoHospital Direction, Bari Policlinico General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Luigi VimercatiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Pasquale StefanizziDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-0196
Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is considered essential for preventing influenza circulation in the hospital setting, vaccination coverage (VC) in this group remains low. Among the reasons cited by HCWs is a lack of time to attend the vaccination clinic. For the 2018/2019 influenza season, active (on-site) influenza vaccination was offered directly in 44 operative units (OUs) of the Bari Policlinico hospital (50 OUs, 3,397 HCWs). At the same time, the hospital granted the HCW access to the vaccination clinic during October and December 2018. VC achieved among HCWs of Bari Policlinico during the 2018/2019 influenza season was then analyzed, and the results compared with those of the 2017/18 season. During the 2018/19 season, VC was 20.4% (n = 798) and thus higher than the 14.2% of the 2017/18 season (+6.2%). The highest VC was among physicians (33.4%), followed by other HCWs (23.8%), auxiliary staff (8.6%), and nurses (7.2%). Overall, 284 (36.5%) HCWs were vaccinated at on-site sessions. Multivariate analysis showed that vaccination uptake was associated with male gender and with work in OU where vaccination was actively offered. On the other hand, being a nurse or auxiliary staff member and working in the surgical area were deterrents. Although VC remained unsatisfactory, active on-site vaccination proved to be an important strategy to improve vaccination compliance, increasing 44% compared to the previous season. Nonetheless, mandatory vaccination directed by public health institutions may be the only way to reach a minimum level of coverage.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationInfluenza Vaccineshealthcare workersInfluenza vaccineon-site strategyvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID34736372
PMCPMC8973379
OpenAlexW3209190074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.