Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34736224›Full record

ReviewJMIR human factors2022

Opportunities and Challenges for Professionals in Psychiatry and Mental Health Care Using Digital Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

Hélène Kane, Jade Gourret Baumgart, Wissam El-Hage, Jocelyn Deloyer, Christine Maes, Marie-Clotilde Lebas, Donatella Marazziti, Johannes Thome, Laurence Fond-Harmant, Frédéric Denis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 and Physical Distancing Measures: Experience of Psychiatric Professionals in Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hélène KaneLaboratoire Éducation, Éthique, Santé, Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-4230
Jade Gourret BaumgartLaboratoire Éducation, Éthique, Santé, Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-4493
Wissam El-HageCentre d'Investigation Clinique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3877-0855
Jocelyn DeloyerCentre Neuropsychiatrique St-Martin, Namur, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9850-2396
Christine MaesCentre Neuropsychiatrique St-Martin, Namur, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-7890
Marie-Clotilde LebasDépartement des Sciences de la Santé Publique et de la Motricité, Haute Ecole de la Province de Namur, Namur, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-5591
Donatella MarazzitiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4021-5829
Johannes ThomeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-2153
Laurence Fond-HarmantAgence de Coopération Scientifique Europe-Afrique-Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-9396
Frédéric DenisLaboratoire Éducation, Éthique, Santé, Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-8689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has required psychiatric and mental health professionals to change their practices to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, in particular by favoring remote monitoring and assessment via digital technologies.

objectiveAs part of a research project that was cofunded by the French National Research Agency (ARN) and the Centre-Val de Loire Region, the aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate how such uses of digital technologies have been developing.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search was carried out in the MEDLINE (ie, PubMed) and Cairn databases, as well as in a platform specializing in mental health, Ascodocpsy. The search yielded 558 results for the year 2020. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, first on titles and abstracts and then on full texts, 61 articles were included.

resultsThe analysis of the literature revealed a heterogeneous integration of digital technologies, not only depending on countries, contexts, and local regulations, but also depending on the modalities of care. Notwithstanding these variations, the use of videoconferencing has developed significantly, affecting working conditions and therapeutic relationships. For many psychiatric and mental health professionals, the pandemic has been an opportunity to build up their experience of remote care and, thus, better identify the possibilities and limits of these digital technologies.

conclusionsNew uses of such technologies essentially consist of a transition from the classic consultation model toward teleconsultation and make less use of the specific potential of artificial intelligence. As professionals were not prepared for these uses, they were confronted with practical difficulties and ethical questions, such as the place of digital technology in care, confidentiality and protection of personal data, and equity in access to care. The COVID-19 health crisis questions how the organization of health care integrates the possibilities offered by digital technology, in particular to promote the autonomy and empowerment of mental health service users.

Indexed as

COVID-19e–mental healthprofessional practicesquality of caretelepsychiatryvideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID34736224
PMCPMC8820762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.