Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34736223›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Core Competencies to Promote Consistency and Standardization of Best Practices for Digital Peer Support: Focus Group Study.

Caroline Collins-Pisano, Juan Velez Court, Michael Johnson, George Mois, Jessica Brooks, Amanda Myers, Anjana Muralidharan, Marianne Storm, Maggie Wright, Nancy Berger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caroline Collins-Pisano *Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-0311
Juan Velez CourtNational Latino Behavioral Health Association, Cochiti Lake, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-4952
Michael JohnsonThe Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities International, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1934-4850
George MoisSchool of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-6097
Jessica BrooksDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-3527
Amanda MyersThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-0938
Anjana MuralidharanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-5524
Marianne StormDepartment of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-5947
Maggie WrightFamilies in Trauma and Recovery, Fife in Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2533-7569
Nancy BergerUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-7369
Ann KasperKasper Connects, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-9423
Anthony FoxTennessee Mental Health Consumer's Association, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9404-9021
Sandi MacDonaldInternational Association of Pre-Menstrual Disorders, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-4875
Sarah SchultzeSchool of Social Work, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-9691
Karen FortunaDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0343-2346

Funding

RRD VA IK2 RX002339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs digital peer support is quickly expanding across the globe in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, standardization in the training and delivery of digital peer support can advance the professionalism of this field. While telehealth competencies exist for other fields of mental health practice, such as social work, psychiatry, and psychology, limited research has been done to develop and promote digital peer support competencies.

objectiveThe goal of this study is to introduce the coproduction of core competencies that can guide digital peer support.

methodsPeer support specialists were recruited through an international listserv and participated in a 1-hour virtual focus group. A total of four focus groups were conducted with 59 peer support specialists from 11 US states and three countries.

resultsAnalysis was conducted using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique, and 10 themes were identified: (1) protecting the rights of service users, (2) technical knowledge and skills in the practice of digital peer support, (3) available technologies, (4) equity of access, (5) digital communication skills, (6) performance-based training, (7) self-care, (8) monitoring digital peer support and addressing digital crisis, (9) peer support competencies, and (10) health literacy (emerging). The authors present recommendations based on these themes.

conclusionsThe introduction of digital peer support core competencies is an initial first step to promote the standardization of best practices in digital peer support. The established competencies can potentially act as a guide for training and skill development to be integrated into US state peer support specialist competencies and to enhance competencies endorsed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

Indexed as

competenciesCOVID-19digitalpeer supporttraining

Identifiers

PMID34736223
PMCPMC8691345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.