ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
Analysis of 329,942 SARS-CoV-2 records retrieved from GISAID database.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19 activity risk calculator as a gamified public health intervention tool.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genomic Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the Dominican Republic and Emergence of a Local Lineage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Comparative genomics, evolutionary epidemiology, and RBD-hACE2 receptor binding pattern in B.1.1.7 (Alpha) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) related to their pandemic response in UK and India.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2022Article
- MutCov: A pipeline for evaluating the effect of mutations in spike protein on infectivity and antigenicity of SARS-CoV-2.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Assessing the Transmissibility of the New SARS-CoV-2 Variants: From Delta to Omicron.Vaccines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-04-20Breach of Policy by Author · Lack of Approval from Third Party ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 virus caused a worldwide pandemic - although none of its predecessors from the coronavirus family ever achieved such a scale. The key to understanding the global success of SARS-CoV-2 is hidden in its genome. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrieved data for 329,942 SARS-CoV-2 records uploaded to the GISAID database from the beginning of the pandemic until the January 8, 2021. A Python variant detection script was developed to process the data using pairwise2 from the BioPython library. Sequence alignments were performed for every gene separately (except ORF1ab, which was not studied). Genomes less than 26,000 nucleotides long were excluded from the research. Clustering was performed using HDBScan.
resultsHere, we addressed the genetic variability of SARS-CoV-2 using 329,942 samples. The analysis yielded 155 SNPs and deletions in more than 0.3% of the sequences. Clustering results suggested that a proportion of people (2.46%) was infected with a distinct subtype of the B.1.1.7 variant, which contained four to six additional mutations (G28881A, G28882A, G28883С, A23403G, A28095T, G25437T). Two clusters were formed by mutations in the samples uploaded predominantly by Denmark and Australia (1.48% and 2.51%, respectively). A correlation coefficient matrix detected 160 pairs of mutations (correlation coefficient greater than 0.7). We also addressed the completeness of the GISAID database, patient gender, and age. Finally, we found ORF6 and E to be the most conserved genes (96.15% and 94.66% of the sequences totally match the reference, respectively). Our results indicate multiple areas for further research in both SARS-CoV-2 studies and health science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.