Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34735614›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2022

Osteoid osteoma of the foot : Presentation, treatment and outcome of a multicentre cohort.

Maria A Smolle, Magdalena M Gilg, Felix Machacek, Miroslav Smerdelj, Per-Ulf Tunn, Blaz Mavcic, Nenad Lujic, Jelena Sopta, Lauris Repsa, Jasminka Igrec and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Maria A SmolleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Magdalena M GilgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Felix MachacekDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Gersthof, Vienna, Austria.
Miroslav SmerdeljDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Per-Ulf TunnDepartment of Tumour Orthopaedics, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin-Buch, Germany.
Blaz MavcicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nenad LujicInstitute for Orthopedic Surgery Banjica, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena SoptaInstitute for Orthopedic Surgery Banjica, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Lauris RepsaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Jasminka IgrecDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas LeithnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Marko BergovecDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. marko.bergovec@medunigraz.at.
Medical University of Graz · ATInstitute of Orthopedics Banjica · RSHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DELjubljana University Medical Centre · SIOrthopaedic Hospital Speising · ATRiga Stradiņš University · LVUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoid osteomas of the foot are rare, with a varying and atypical clinical as well as radiological presentation impeding early diagnosis and treatment. The aim of the present multicentre study was to 1) analyze epidemiological, clinical and radiological findings of patients with foot osteoid osteomas and to 2) deduce a diagnostic algorithm based on the findings.

methodsA total of 37 patients (25 males, 67.6%, mean age 23.9 years, range 8-57 years) with osteoid osteomas of the foot were retrospectively included, treated between 2000 and 2014 at 6 participating tertiary tumor centres. Radiographic images were analyzed, as were patients' minor and major complaints, pain relief and recurrence.

resultsMost osteoid osteomas were located in the midfoot (n = 16) and hindfoot (n = 14). Painful lesions were present in all but one patient (97.3%). Symptom duration was similar for hindfoot and midfoot/forefoot (p = 0.331). Cortical lesions required fewer x‑rays for diagnosis than lesions at other sites (p = 0.026). A typical nidus could be detected in only 23/37 of x‑rays (62.2%), compared to 25/29 CT scans (86.2%) and 11/22 MRIs (50%). Aspirin test was positive in 18/20 patients (90%), 31 patients (83.8%) underwent open surgery. Pain relief was achieved in 34/36 patients (outcome unknown in one), whilst pain persisted in two patients with later confirmed recurrence.

conclusionsAs previously reported, CT scans seem to be superior to MRIs towards detection of the typical nidus in foot osteoid osteomas. In patients with unclear pain of the foot and inconclusive x‑rays, osteoid osteoma should be considered as differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteoma, OsteoidAdolescentAdultChildHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDiagnosisFoot tumourOsteoid osteomaRadiologySymptoms

Identifiers

PMID34735614
PMCPMC9213275
OpenAlexW3209998991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.