ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Sclerosing hyperostotic bone disorders].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueDiagnosis of sclerosing and hyperostotic bone disorders (SHS) is challenging. The correct and early identification of SHS can have therapeutic, prognostic and, in case of genetic SHS with regard to the risk of inheritance, advisory consequences. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsFor diagnosis, radiographic examinations and supplementary computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used. These are of indicative nature. Definitive diagnosis is usually made by genetic differentiation. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: In combination with the age of the affected person and the location of the osseous changes the characteristic image criteria are important. These are summarized in groups in this overview. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Projection radiography in two planes is the imaging modality of choice. CT and MR can detect additional differential diagnostic criteria and should be indicated when needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34735583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.