Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34735483›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Based on improved deep convolutional neural network model pneumonia image classification.

Lingzhi Kong, Jinyong Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lingzhi KongSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China.
Jinyong ChengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China.
Shandong Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia remains the leading infectious cause of death in children under the age of five, killing about 700,000 children each year and affecting 7% of the world's population. X-ray images of lung become the key to the diagnosis of this disease, skilled doctors in the diagnosis of a certain degree of subjectivity, if the use of computer-aided medical diagnosis to automatically detect lung abnormalities, will improve the accuracy of diagnosis. This research aims to introduce a deep learning technology based on the combination of Xception neural network and long-term short-term memory (LSTM), which can realize automatic diagnosis of patients with pneumonia in X-ray images. First, the model uses the Xception network to extract the deep features of the data, passes the extracted features to the LSTM, and then the LSTM detects the extracted features, and finally selects the most needed features. Secondly, in the training set samples, the traditional cross-entropy loss cannot more balance the mismatch between categories. Therefore, this research combines Pearson's feature selection ideas, fusion of the correlation between the two loss functions, and optimizes the problem. The experimental results show that the accuracy rate of this paper is 96%, the receiver operator characteristic curve accuracy rate is 99%, the precision rate is 98%, the recall rate is 91%, and the F1 score accuracy rate is 94%. Compared with the existing technical methods, the research has achieved expected results on the currently available datasets. And assist doctors to provide higher reliability in the classification task of childhood pneumonia.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningHumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerPneumoniaThorax

Identifiers

PMID34735483
PMCPMC8568342
OpenAlexW3209254411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.