Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34735480›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Safe reopening of college campuses during COVID-19: The University of California experience in Fall 2020.

Brad H Pollock, A Marm Kilpatrick, David P Eisenman, Kristie L Elton, George W Rutherford, Bernadette M Boden-Albala, David M Souleles, Laura E Polito, Natasha K Martin, Carrie L Byington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Undergraduate Teaching During COVID-19.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Students at a crossroad: A cross-sectional survey gauging the impact of COVID-19 on medical and biomedical graduates in the United States and Sweden.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brad H PollockDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-8638
A Marm KilpatrickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
David P EisenmanDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Kristie L EltonUniversity of California Office of the President, Oakland, California, United States of America.
George W RutherfordDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-8287
Bernadette M Boden-AlbalaDepartment of Health Society and Behavior, Program in Public Health, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
David M SoulelesDepartment of Health Society and Behavior, Program in Public Health, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Laura E PolitoStudent Health, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Natasha K MartinDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Carrie L ByingtonUniversity of California Office of the President, Oakland, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-9495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemics of COVID-19 in student populations at universities were a key concern for the 2020-2021 school year. The University of California (UC) System developed a set of recommendations to reduce campus infection rates. SARS-CoV-2 test results are summarized for the ten UC campuses during the Fall 2020 term.

methodsUC mitigation efforts included protocols for the arrival of students living on-campus students, non-pharmaceutical interventions, daily symptom monitoring, symptomatic testing, asymptomatic surveillance testing, isolation and quarantine protocols, student ambassador programs for health education, campus health and safety pledges, and lowered density of on-campus student housing. We used data from UC campuses, the UC Health-California Department of Public Health Data Modeling Consortium, and the U.S. Census to estimate the proportion of each campus' student populations that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and compared it to the fraction individuals aged 20-29 years who tested positive in their respective counties.

resultsSARS-CoV-2 cases in campus populations were generally low in September and October 2020, but increased in November and especially December, and were highest in early to mid-January 2021, mirroring case trajectories in their respective counties. Many students were infected during the Thanksgiving and winter holiday recesses and were detected as cases upon returning to campus. The proportion of students who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during Fall 2020 ranged from 1.2% to 5.2% for students living on campus and was similar to students living off campus. For most UC campuses the proportion of students testing positive was lower than that for the 20-29-year-old population in which campuses were located.

conclusionsThe layered mitigation approach used on UC campuses, informed by public health science and augmented perhaps by a more compliant population, likely minimized campus transmission and outbreaks and limited transmission to surrounding communities. University policies that include these mitigation efforts in Fall 2020 along with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, may alleviate some local concerns about college students returning to communities and facilitate resumption of normal campus operations and in-person instruction.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2UniversitiesAdultCaliforniaCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesDisease OutbreaksEducational StatusEpidemicsFemaleGeographyHumansMaleMass ScreeningCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34735480
PMCPMC8568179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.