Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734830›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Reducing Intrusive Memories of Childhood Trauma Using a Visuospatial Intervention: Case Study in Iceland.

Kristjana Thorarinsdottir, Emily A Holmes, Johann Hardarson, Unnur Hedinsdottir, Marie Kanstrup, Laura Singh, Arna Hauksdottir, Thorhildur Halldorsdottir, Berglind Gudmundsdottir, Unnur Valdimarsdottir and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristjana Thorarinsdottir *Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-1333
Emily A HolmesDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112
Johann HardarsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-0526
Unnur HedinsdottirDepartment of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-2029
Marie KanstrupDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-5288
Laura SinghDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-7247
Arna HauksdottirCentre of Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-1059
Thorhildur HalldorsdottirDepartment of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0637-8912
Berglind GudmundsdottirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-7723
Unnur ValdimarsdottirCentre of Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-946X
Edda Bjork ThordardottirCentre of Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-9611
Beau GambleDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8284-9371
Andri BjornssonDepartment of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2512
University of Iceland · ISUppsala University · SEHarvard University · USKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdditional interventions are needed for survivors of psychological trauma because of several barriers to and limitations of existing treatment options (eg, need to talk about the trauma in detail). Case studies are an important step in exploring the development of novel interventions, allowing detailed examination of individual responses to treatment over time. Here, we present a case study that aims to test a novel intervention designed to disrupt memory reconsolidation, taking a single-symptom approach by focusing on intrusive memories of a traumatic event.

objectiveThis study aims to examine a novel brief cognitive intervention to reduce the number of intrusive memories of trauma in an Icelandic setting and to extend previous studies by examining long-term effects for up to 3 months. The intervention was guided by a clinical psychologist and comprised a brief memory reminder, followed by Tetris gameplay with mental rotation, targeting one memory at a time in each session.

methodsThis was a single case study in Iceland with a woman in her 50s (drawn from an epidemiological study of trauma) with subthreshold posttraumatic stress disorder and a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder and social anxiety disorder. The participant had four different intrusive memories from a traumatic event that happened in her childhood. The primary outcome was the change in the number of intrusive memories from baseline to intervention phase and to follow-ups. The number of intrusions was monitored in a daily diary for 4 weeks preintervention, 8 weeks during the intervention, and 1 week at 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. Intrusions were targeted one by one over six intervention sessions, creating four repetitions of an AB design (ie, length of baseline A and intervention phase B varied for each memory). We examined changes in both the total number of intrusions (summed across all four memories) and individually for each memory. In addition, we explored whether having fewer intrusive memories would have an impact on functioning, posttraumatic stress, and depression or anxiety symptoms.

resultsThe total number of intrusions per week was 12.6 at baseline, 6.1 at the intervention phase (52% reduction from baseline), 3.0 at the 1-month follow-up (76% reduction), and 1.0 at the 3-month follow-up (92% reduction). Reductions in the symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression were observed postintervention. Sleep, concentration, stress, and functioning improved. The participant considered the gameplay intervention acceptable and helpful in that she found that the memories disappeared while she was playing.

conclusionsThis guided brief cognitive intervention reduced the number of intrusive memories over the intervention phase and follow-ups. The brief memory reminder was well tolerated, removing the need to discuss trauma in detail. The next steps require an extension to more cases and exploring remote delivery of the intervention.

Indexed as

case reportintrusive memoriesmental imagerymobile phonepsychological traumaTetris gameplayvisuospatial interference task

Identifiers

PMID34734830
PMCPMC8603162
OpenAlexW3181292831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.