Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734509›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2021

Skin Testing With Peach Peel Extract

Maria Luisa Somoza, Ana Prieto-Moreno Pfeifer, Laura Martín-Pedraza, Laura Victorio Puche, Angel Esteban Rodríguez, Natalia Blanca-López, Abel Eva Fernández González, Enrique Fernández-Caldas, Miriam Morán Morales, Francisco Javier Fernández-Sánchez and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Skin Prick Testing Predicts Peach Hypersensitivity Reactions.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Luisa SomozaDepartment of Allergy, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. mlsomoza@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0141-8914
Ana Prieto-Moreno PfeiferDepartment of Allergy, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Martín-PedrazaDepartment of Allergy, Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (FIIB) de los Hospitales Universitarios Infanta Leonor y Sureste, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-0662
Laura Victorio PucheDepartment of Allergy, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
Angel Esteban RodríguezDepartment of Clinical Analysis, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Natalia Blanca-LópezDepartment of Allergy, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1492-9887
Abel Eva Fernández GonzálezR&D Department, Inmunotek Laboratories, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Fernández-CaldasR&D Department, Inmunotek Laboratories, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-6932
Miriam Morán MoralesR&D Department, Inmunotek Laboratories, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Fernández-SánchezDepartment of Allergy, General University Hospital of Alicante-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-7199
José Damián López SánchezDepartment of Allergy, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
José Luis Subiza Garrido-LestacheR&D Department, Inmunotek Laboratories, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-5321
Gabriela CantoDepartment of Allergy, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel BlancaDepartment of Allergy, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESInmunotek (Spain) · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

European Regional Development Fund RD16/0006/0024European Regional Development Fund RD16/0006/0032Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMinistry of Economy and Competiveness
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most important peach fruit allergen is Pru p 3, followed by Pru p 1, Pru p 4, and Pru p 7. We aimed to assess their role in subjects with peach fruit-induced allergy (anaphylaxis and OAS) and compare skin prick tests (SPT) vs. specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) for predicting anaphylaxis. We also selected a control group. SPT included prevalent inhalant and plant food allergens plus peach peel extract. The sIgE to Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, and Pru p 7 were quantified. Compared with controls (n = 42), cases (n = 41) were younger (

Indexed as

allergyanaphylaxisfood hypersensitivityfruitimmunoglobulin EPeachpollenskin tests

Identifiers

PMID34734509
PMCPMC8569022
OpenAlexW3209024279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.