Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734503›Full record

ReviewAllergy, asthma & immunology research2021

Utility of Cough Provocation Tests in Chronic Cough and Respiratory Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and Introduction of New Reference Ranges for the Capsaicin Test.

Heikki Olavi Koskela, Hanna Maria Nurmi, Surinder Singh Birring

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Repeat expansions inERJ open research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chronic cough as a disease.ERJ open research · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Chronic cough: is the end nigh?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Measuring cough: what really matters?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cough hypersensitivity and chronic cough.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heikki Olavi KoskelaUnit for Medicine and Clinical Research, Pulmonary Division, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-3262
Hanna Maria NurmiUnit for Medicine and Clinical Research, Pulmonary Division, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Surinder Singh BirringCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-6291
University of Eastern Finland · FIKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cough provocation tests (CPTs) are an objective measurement of the sensitivity of the cough reflex arc. However, they are not established in clinical practice because a large variability of response in healthy subjects limits their diagnostic value. There is a paucity of studies that have investigated CPT reference ranges in healthy subjects. This systematic review describes the variability of the responses to CPTs in healthy subjects and factors that influence it. A new analysis of 134 healthy subjects was conducted to create reference ranges for single-breath capsaicin CPT by calculating the interquartile ranges for the provocative concentration of capsaicin to induce 2 and 5 coughs. Female subjects had a more sensitive cough reflex than male counterparts. The ability of CPTs to distinguish various respiratory diseases from healthy subjects was also reviewed. Cough sensitivity was consistently heightened in the following groups: unselected patients with chronic, refractory, or recurrent cough, unexplained chronic cough, gastro-esophageal reflux-associated cough, cough-variant asthma, lower airway symptoms induced by chemical irritants, and fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. In the following groups, hypersensitivity of the cough reflex was present in those individuals whose symptom profile was predominated by cough: asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, and sarcoidosis. In the following conditions, patients usually cough in order to expectorate mucus from their airways, not because of a hypersensitive cough reflex arc: productive cough, asthma, upper airway cough syndrome, COPD, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, and chronic respiratory infections. CPTs have the potential to identify patients with chronic respiratory symptoms due to cough reflex hypersensitivity, thereby providing a targeted approach for therapy.

Indexed as

citric acidCoughhypersensitivity, capsaicinmannitolreference valuesreflexsaline solution, hypertonic solutions

Identifiers

PMID34734503
PMCPMC8569027
OpenAlexW3209780405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.