Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734315›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2022

Computed tomography of pulmonary veins: review of congenital and acquired pathologies.

Erin K Romberg, A Luana Stanescu, Sadaf T Bhutta, Randolph K Otto, Mark R Ferguson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin K RombergDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. Erin.Romberg@seattlechildrens.org.
A Luana StanescuDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Sadaf T BhuttaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Randolph K OttoDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Mark R FergusonDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newer-generation CT scanners with ultrawide detectors or dual sources offer millisecond image acquisition times and significantly decreased radiation doses compared to historical cardiac CT and CT angiography. This technology is capable of nearly freezing cardiac and respiratory motion. As a result, CT is increasingly used for diagnosing and monitoring cardiac and vascular abnormalities in the pediatric population. CT is particularly useful in the setting of pulmonary vein evaluation because it offers evaluation of the entire pulmonary venous system and lung parenchyma. In this article we review a spectrum of congenital and acquired pulmonary venous abnormalities, including potential etiologies, CT imaging findings and important factors of preoperative planning. In addition, we discuss optimization of CT techniques for evaluating the pulmonary veins.

Indexed as

Pulmonary VeinsChildComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildrenComputed tomographyComputed tomography angiographyCongenital heart diseaseHeartInfantsPulmonary veins

Identifiers

PMID34734315
OpenAlexW3209002491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.