Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734314›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2022

Psychedelic experience dose-dependently modulated by cannabis: results of a prospective online survey.

Joanna Kuc, Hannes Kettner, Fernando Rosas, David Erritzoe, Eline Haijen, Mendel Kaelen, David Nutt, Robin L Carhart-Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Moving beyond 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects of Psychedelics in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna KucDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK. joanna.kuc18@alumni.imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-7176
Hannes KettnerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Fernando RosasDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David ErritzoeDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Eline HaijenDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Mendel KaelenDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David NuttDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Robin L Carhart-HarrisDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleClassic psychedelics are currently being studied as novel treatments for a range of psychiatric disorders. However, research on how psychedelics interact with other psychoactive substances remains scarce.

objectivesThe current study aimed to explore the subjective effects of psychedelics when used alongside cannabis.

methodsParticipants (n = 321) completed a set of online surveys at 2 time points: 7 days before, and 1 day after a planned experience with a serotonergic psychedelic. The collected data included demographics, environmental factors (so-called setting) and five validated questionnaires: Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ), visual subscales of Altered States of Consciousness Questionnaire (ASC-Vis), Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), Ego Dissolution Inventory (EDI) and Emotional Breakthrough Inventory (EBI). Participants were grouped according to whether they had reported using no cannabis (n = 195) or low (n = 53), medium (n = 45) or high (n = 28) dose, directly concomitant with the psychedelic. Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and contrasts was used to analyse differences in subjective effects between groups while controlling for potential confounding contextual 'setting' variables.

resultsThe simultaneous use of cannabis together with classic serotonergic psychedelics was associated with more intense psychedelic experience across a range of measures: a linear relationship was found between dose and MEQ, ASC-Vis and EDI scores, while a quadratic relationship was found for CEQ scores. No relationship was found between the dose of cannabis and the EBI.

conclusionsResults imply a possible interaction between the cannabis and psychedelic on acute subjective experiences; however, design limitations hamper our ability to draw firm inferences on directions of causality and the clinical implications of any such interactions.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensAnalgesicsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsEmotionsHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsHallucinogensCannabisChallenging experienceHarm reductionMystical experiencePeak experiencePsychedelicsRecreational useSet and settingSubjective experience

Identifiers

PMID34734314
PMCPMC9110465
OpenAlexW3208662682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.