Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734301›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

The utility of laparoscopic ultrasound during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who have undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Emin Kose, Bora Kahramangil, Andrei S Purysko, Husnu Aydin, Mustafa Donmez, Kazunari Sasaki, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Cristiano Quintini, Federico Aucejo, Eren Berber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emin KoseDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Bora KahramangilDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Andrei S PuryskoSection of Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Husnu AydinDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Mustafa DonmezDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Kazunari SasakiDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Choon Hyuck David KwonDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cristiano QuintiniDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Federico AucejoDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Eren BerberDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. berbere@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-1794
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the utility of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsMedical records of patients with malignant liver lesions who underwent laparoscopic liver surgery between October 2005 and January 2018 and who underwent an MRI examination at our institution within a month before surgery were collected from a prospectively maintained database. The size and location of tumors detected on LUS, as well as whether they were seen on preoperative imaging, were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors that were associated with the detection of liver lesions on LUS that were not seen on preoperative MRI.

resultsA total of 467 lesions were identified in 147 patients. Tumor types included colorectal cancer metastasis (n = 53), hepatocellular cancer (n = 38), neuroendocrine metastasis (n = 23), and others (n = 33). Procedures included ablation (67%), resection (23%), combined resection and ablation (6%), and diagnostic laparoscopy with biopsy (4%). LUS identified 39 additional lesions (8.4%) that were not seen on preoperative MRI in 14 patients (10%). These were colorectal cancer (n = 20, 51%), neuroendocrine (n = 11, 28%) and other metastases (n = 8, 21%). These additional findings on LUS changed the treatment plan in 13 patients (8.8%). Factors predicting tumor detection on LUS but not on MRI included obesity (p = 0.02), previous exposure to chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and lesion size < 1 cm (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that, despite advances in MRI, LUS performed during minimally invasive liver procedures may detect additional tumors in 10% of patients with liver malignancies, with the highest yield seen in obese patients with previous exposure to chemotherapy. These results support the routine use of LUS by hepatic surgeons.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularColorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingIntraoperative liver ultrasonographyLaparoscopic liver surgeryLaparoscopic ultrasoundMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34734301
OpenAlexW3210633070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.