ArticleJournal of animal science2021
Strategic administration of an appeasing substance to improve performance and physiological responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bovine appeasing pheromone mitigates long-distance transport stress to improve health and growth performance in beef cattle.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Alleviating calf weaning stress: the important role of maternal bovine appeasing substance in calf husbandry management.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Effects of maternal appeasing substance and castration status on growth performance and health in newly received, high-risk beef calves.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Impacts of Maternal Bovine Appeasing Substance Administered at Weaning on Behavioral and Physiological Adaptation of Beef Heifers to the Feedlot.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Effects of administering the maternal bovine appeasing substance on growth performance, cortisol level and carcass characteristics of finishing feedlot cattle.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Administering the maternal appeasing substance toTranslational animal science · 2025Article
- Evaluating the efficacy of Maternal Bovine Appeasing Substance (MBAS) administration on cortisol concentrations, animal behavior and welfare, and performance outcomes in beef-dairy calves during weaning.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- Multiple administrations of bovine-appeasing substance during a 42-d preconditioning program followed by feedlot receiving and its effects on physiologic, health, and performance responses of feeder cattle.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Effects of an Appeasing Substance Application at Weaning on Growth, Stress, Behavior, and Response to Vaccination ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Administering an Appeasing Substance to Improve Performance, Neuroendocrine Stress Response, and Health of Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the timing of administration of the bovine appeasing substance (BAS) on performance and physiological responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle. Nellore bulls (n = 100) were ranked by initial body weight (BW; 341 ± 18.5 kg) and assigned to receive BAS (n = 50) or placebo (CON; n = 50) on day -2 of the experiment. Treatments (5 mL) were applied topically to the nuchal skin area of each bull. Bulls were loaded into commercial livestock trailers immediately after treatment administration, transported for 880 km, and unloaded on day -1 at a commercial feedyard. On day 0, bulls within each treatment were again assigned to receive, in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, BAS or CON as described previously (25 bulls/treatment combination). Upon treatment administration on day 0, bulls were housed in 12 feedlot pens (3 pens/treatment) for a 108-d feeding period, which was divided into an adaptation (days 0-19), growing (days 20-60), and finishing (days 61-108) phases. Dry matter intake (DMI) was measured daily from days 0 to 108, whereas blood samples and hair from the tail switch were collected on days -2, 0, 19, 60, and 108. Administration of BAS prior to loading (day -2) improved ADG, FE, and DMI during adaptation and across the 108-d feeding period (P ≤ 0.08), resulting in greater (P = 0.03) hot carcass weight and dressing percentage upon slaughter on day 109. A treatment × day interaction was detected for serum glucose concentrations (P = 0.05), which was greater (P = 0.03) on day 60 of the feeding period in bulls receiving CON prior to loading. Administration of BAS at feedlot entry (day 0) improved DMI, ADG, and FE during adaptation (P ≤ 0.05), but it did not impact (P ≥ 0.18) performance and carcass traits during the 108-d feeding period. Bulls administered BAS prior to loading and at feedlot entry had less (P ≤ 0.05) mean serum cortisol concentrations across the 108-d feeding period (loading × feedlot entry interaction; P = 0.10) and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum insulin concentration on day 60 (loading × feedlot entry × day interaction; P = 0.05). In summary, BAS administration prior to loading increased the overall feedlot performance of Nellore bulls. These outcomes were noted in bulls that received or not a second BAS administration at feedlot entry, suggesting that the benefits of BAS are exploited when this substance is administered before transport to the feedlot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.