Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34734219›Full record

ReviewNatural product reports2021

Benefiting from big data in natural products: importance of preserving foundational skills and prioritizing data quality.

Nadja B Cech, Marnix H Medema, Jon Clardy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural product reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadja B CechChemistry, University of North Carolina Greensboro, USA. nadja_cech@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-746X
Marnix H MedemaBioinformatics, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. marnix.medema@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-2821
Jon ClardyBiological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, USA. jon_clardy@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-8356

Funding

Urgent Covid-19 Revision to the Center for High-Throughput Functional Annotation of Natural ProductsU41AT008718 · NCCIH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CECH, NADJA B, LININGTON, ROGER G · 2015 to 2024
$10.1M
NCCIH NIH HHS U41 AT008718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic, large-scale, studies at the genomic, metabolomic, and functional level have transformed the natural product sciences. Improvements in technology and reduction in cost for obtaining spectroscopic, chromatographic, and genomic data coupled with the creation of readily accessible curated and functionally annotated data sets have altered the practices of virtually all natural product research laboratories. Gone are the days when the natural products researchers were expected to devote themselves exclusively to the isolation, purification, and structure elucidation of small molecules. We now also engage with big data in taxonomic, genomic, proteomic, and/or metabolomic collections, and use these data to generate and test hypotheses. While the oft stated aim for the use of large-scale -omics data in the natural products sciences is to achieve a rapid increase in the rate of discovery of new drugs, this has not yet come to pass. At the same time, new technologies have provided unexpected opportunities for natural products chemists to ask and answer new and different questions. With this viewpoint, we discuss the evolution of big data as a part of natural products research and provide a few examples of how discoveries have been enabled by access to big data. We also draw attention to some of the limitations in our existing engagement with large datasets and consider what would be necessary to overcome them.

Indexed as

Big DataBiological ProductsData AccuracyGenomicsSpectrum AnalysisBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID34734219
PMCPMC8597707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.