ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2021
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting New-onset Depression in a Military Population.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Clinically Significant Depressive Symptoms at 2-Year Follow-Up in Older Adults: Machine Learning Study Using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Prospective prediction of first onset of major depressive disorder in midlife using machine learning.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- A risk prediction system for depression in middle-aged and older adults grounded in machine learning and visualization technology: a cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After Military Deployment.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Cohort profile: the Ohio Army National Guard Mental Health Initiative (OHARNG-MHI).Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDepression is one of the most common mental disorders in the United States in both civilian and military populations, but few prospective studies assess a wide range of predictors across multiple domains for new-onset (incident) depression in adulthood. Supervised machine learning methods can identify predictors of incident depression out of many different candidate variables, without some of the assumptions and constraints that underlie traditional regression analyses. The objectives of this study were to identify predictors of incident depression across 5 years of follow-up using machine learning, and to assess prediction accuracy of the algorithms.
methodsData were from a cohort of Army National Guard members free of history of depression at baseline (
resultsStressors and traumas such as emotional mistreatment and adverse childhood experiences, demographics such as being a parent or student, and military characteristics including paygrade and deployment location were predictive of probable depression. Cross-validated random forest algorithms were moderately accurate (68% for women and 73% for men).
conclusionsEvents and characteristics throughout the life course, both in and outside of deployment, predict incident depression in adulthood among military personnel. Although replication studies are needed, these results may help inform potential intervention targets to reduce depression incidence among military personnel. Future research should further refine and explore interactions between identified variables.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.