ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Clinical pharmacist participation in selecting and dosing targeted drugs for a patient with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a lung immune prognostic index-based nomogram model for predicting overall survival and immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with sintilimab.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Anti‑PD‑1 immune checkpoint inhibitor inducing endocrine toxicity in a patient with advanced lung cancer: A case report and literature review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- Aumolertinib challenge as an optional treatment in advanced non small-cell lung cancer after osimertinib failure with epidermal growth factor receptor-sensitive mutation: A case series.Oncology letters · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceritinib and alectinib are recommended as the second-line therapies in the 2019 Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in whom the first-line therapy has failed, but no optimal second-line treatment has been identified. Before 2018, the approved dose of ceritinib in the United States and many other countries was 750 mg/d fasted. In China, the approved dose was 450 mg/d fed although the dose of 750 mg/d fasted is still used in clinical practices. In our current case, a clinical pharmacist was involved in the selection and dose adjustment of a targeted drug for an ALK-positive NSCLC patient. The selection of second-line targeted drugs is based mainly on the results of clinical trials and real-world data of ceritinib and aletinib, along with the comprehensive analysis of health insurance policy, pharmacoeconomics, and drug accessibility. Alectinib may be more efficacious than ceritinib is in second-line settings. However, in our current case, the patient finally chose ceritinib after considering the drug prices and the health insurance policy. The clinical pharmacist optimized the dosage of ceritinib from 750 mg/d fasted to 450 mg/d fed, which not only improved the patient's medication compliance but also ensured the safety and efficacy of the drug; in addition, it lowered the financial burden of both the health insurance system and the patient, offering a good example for rational drug use and health insurance cost reduction. In conclusion, in choosing second-line targeted therapy for ALK-rearranged NSCLC, a variety of factors should be considered, including clinical efficacy, adverse effects, health insurance policy, drug price, and drug accessibility, and the dosage of ceritinib should be optimized to 450 mg/d fed in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.