Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733829›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels for Microencapsulation of Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine.

Si-Yuen Lee, Jingyi Ma, Tze Sean Khoo, Norfadhilatuladha Abdullah, Nik Nur Farisha Nik Md Noordin Kahar, Zuratul Ain Abdul Hamid, Muzaimi Mustapha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Mairá-Potato (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Engineering Bio-Adhesives Based on Protein-Polysaccharide Phase Separation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Si-Yuen LeeDepartment of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Jingyi MaDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Tze Sean KhooUKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
Norfadhilatuladha AbdullahAdvanced Membrane Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia.
Nik Nur Farisha Nik Md Noordin KaharSchool of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia.
Zuratul Ain Abdul HamidSchool of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia.
Muzaimi MustaphaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia · MYUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell-based therapy appears as a promising strategy to induce regeneration of damaged and diseased tissues. However, low survival, poor engraftment and a lack of site-specificity are major drawbacks. Polysaccharide hydrogels can address these issues and offer several advantages as cell delivery vehicles. They have become very popular due to their unique properties such as high-water content, biocompatibility, biodegradability and flexibility. Polysaccharide polymers can be physically or chemically crosslinked to construct biomimetic hydrogels. Their resemblance to living tissues mimics the native three-dimensional extracellular matrix and supports stem cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. Given the intricate nature of communication between hydrogels and stem cells, understanding their interaction is crucial. Cells are incorporated with polysaccharide hydrogels using various microencapsulation techniques, allowing generation of more relevant models and further enhancement of stem cell therapies. This paper provides a comprehensive review of human stem cells and polysaccharide hydrogels most used in regenerative medicine. The recent and advanced stem cell microencapsulation techniques, which include extrusion, emulsion, lithography, microfluidics, superhydrophobic surfaces and bioprinting, are described. This review also discusses current progress in clinical translation of stem-cell encapsulated polysaccharide hydrogels for cell delivery and disease modeling (drug testing and discovery) with focuses on musculoskeletal, nervous, cardiac and cancerous tissues.

Indexed as

cell deliverydisease modelingmicroencapsulationpolysaccharide hydrogelsregenerative medicinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID34733829
PMCPMC8558675
OpenAlexW3205136593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.