ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
Primary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the penis: a case report and literature review.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soft tissue tumours of the penis. The 30-year Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano experience.Pathologica · 2024Article
- A SEER database retrospective cohort of 547 patients with penile non-squamous cell carcinoma: demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Penile Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma in a Child.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular tumour with an intermediate behaviour between benign hemangioma and malignant angiosarcoma. There is scarce data on the penile EHE's management and its natural history, as our knowledge is based on few reported cases with a short follow-up period. We present a case report and conducted a literature review, including 17 cases. The relevance of this case report derives from the need for better clinical characterization of patients with penile EHE and the importance of defining the outcomes. We report the case of a 53-year-old male with a 1-year history of sleep-related painful erections. Imaging techniques showed a well-defined hypoechoic and hypervascular solid nodule on the dorsal aspect of the penis. It was surgically removed, and the histopathological study revealed a low-risk EHE of the penis. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography did not demonstrate local recurrence nor metastases. According to the literature review, most of the patients were in their fifth and sixth decades of life at the time of diagnosis and lesions were usually located in the glans. The most common clinical presentation was as a painful mass. Follow-up period ranged from 2 months to 5 years. Three patients showed systemic metastases, two of which died due to cancer. The conclusions from the literature review are limited by the reduced number of cases and the short follow-up. This case report highlights the importance of understanding the diagnosis and treatment of this type of rare non-squamous malignant tumours of the penis. Penile EHE is a malignant vascular tumour that is very rare in this location. The best treatment is local excision, with re-excision or intraoperative margins assessment. Occasionally, systemic chemotherapy and radiation therapy can be useful. There is consensus on the importance of very strict follow-up of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.