Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733654›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

The prognostic roles of CYP19A1 expression in bladder cancer patients of different genders.

Shanghua Cai, Yuanfa Feng, Jianheng Ye, Yulin Deng, Zhiduan Cai, Xuejin Zhu, Ren Liu, Yixun Zhang, Zhihao Zou, Zhenfeng Tang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shanghua CaiDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanfa FengDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianheng YeDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yulin DengDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiduan CaiDepartment of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuejin ZhuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ren LiuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yixun ZhangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhihao ZouDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenfeng TangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaodong HanDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Chi Tin HonMacau Institute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Weide ZhongDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huichan HeDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of bladder cancer (BCa) in male is approximately three to four times higher than in female, but the oncological outcomes in female patients with BCa are significantly worse than in male patients. Although many biomarkers have been identified in recent decades to predict the prognosis of BCa patients, few of them are able to distinguish the prognosis of BCa patients with gender difference. Aromatase encoded by the CYP19A1 gene catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. In this study, we investigate the prognosis significance of CYP19A1 expression considering the gender difference in BCa patients from four available public databases.

methodsFour available public databases of BCa, including GSE13507, TCGA-BLCA, E-MTAB-4321, and E-MTAB-1803, were utilized in this analysis. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in different stages and genders were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis based on the optimal cut-off values of CYP19A1 expression. Then, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were further performed to explore the potential biologic pathways by altering CYP19A1 expression in BCa patients.

resultsThe results showed that patients with high CYP19A1 expression had a poorer outcome compared with those with low expression in both BCa cohorts in general. Higher CYP19A1 expression in male patients were significantly associated with shorter survival for either non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, female NMIBC patients with high CYP19A1 expression were identified to have a better prognosis, whereas high CYP19A1 expression in female MIBC patients were significantly associated with poorer survival. The result of the GSEA showed that different outcomes in female and male patients with NMIBC were related to the interaction of CYP19A1 and the cell-cycle-related pathways.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrated that CYP19A1 expression might have a potential role in distinguishing the prognosis of female BCa patients dependent on tumor stage. Our results provide new insights for aromatase-mediated BCa therapy.

Indexed as

bioinformatics analysisbladder cancer (BCa)CYP19A1gender differenceprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34733654
PMCPMC8511542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.