Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733603›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Deep Learning Based Staging of Bone Lesions From Computed Tomography Scans.

Samira Masoudi, Sherif Mehralivand, Stephanie A Harmon, Nathan Lay, Liza Lindenberg, Esther Mena, Peter A Pinto, Deborah E Citrin, James L Gulley, Bradford J Wood and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samira MasoudiMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Sherif MehralivandMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Stephanie A HarmonMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nathan LayMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Liza LindenbergMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Esther MenaMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Peter A PintoMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Deborah E CitrinMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
James L GulleyMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-2912
Bradford J WoodMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-0051
William L DahutMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ravi A MadanMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ulas BagciDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-6829
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-8826
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0853-6494
National Institutes of Health · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we formulated an efficient deep learning-based classification strategy for characterizing metastatic bone lesions using computed tomography scans (CTs) of prostate cancer patients. For this purpose, 2,880 annotated bone lesions from CT scans of 114 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were used for training, validation, and final evaluation. These annotations were in the form of lesion full segmentation, lesion type and labels of either benign or malignant. In this work, we present our approach in developing the state-of-the-art model to classify bone lesions as benign or malignant, where (1) we introduce a valuable dataset to address a clinically important problem, (2) we increase the reliability of our model by patient-level stratification of our dataset following lesion-aware distribution at each of the training, validation, and test splits, (3) we explore the impact of lesion texture, morphology, size, location, and volumetric information on the classification performance, (4) we investigate the functionality of lesion classification using different algorithms including lesion-based average 2D ResNet-50, lesion-based average 2D ResNeXt-50, 3D ResNet-18, 3D ResNet-50, as well as the ensemble of 2D ResNet-50 and 3D ResNet-18. For this purpose, we employed a train/validation/test split equal to 75%/12%/13% with several data augmentation methods applied to the training dataset to avoid overfitting and to increase reliability. We achieved an accuracy of 92.2% for correct classification of benign vs. malignant bone lesions in the test set using an ensemble of lesion-based average 2D ResNet-50 and 3D ResNet-18 with texture, volumetric information, and morphology having the greatest discriminative power respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest ever achieved lesion-level accuracy having a very comprehensive data set for such a clinically important problem. This level of classification performance in the early stages of metastasis development bodes well for clinical translation of this strategy.

Indexed as

Bone lesionclassificationCT scandeep learninglesion-aware data stratification

Identifiers

PMID34733603
PMCPMC8562651
OpenAlexW3155264285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.