ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021
Deep Learning Based Staging of Bone Lesions From Computed Tomography Scans.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- GLAPAL-H: Global, Local, and Parts Aware Learner for Hydrocephalus Infection Diagnosis in Low-Field MRI.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- End-to-End Deep Learning Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Osteosarcoma Patients Using Routine MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Comprehensive Automated Bone Lesion Detection and Classification on Staging Computed Tomography Scans.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- GLAPAL-H: Global, Local, And Parts Aware Learner for Hydrocephalus Infection Diagnosis in Low-Field MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Automatic Segmentation and Molecular Subtype Classification of Breast Cancer Using an MRI-based Deep Learning Framework.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics Applied to Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Imaging: A Review.iRadiology · 2024Article
- Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics for Long-Term Prognostication of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Received Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Application of Machine Learning for Differentiating Bone Malignancy on Imaging: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Investigating the Role of Image Fusion in Brain Tumor Classification Models Based on Machine Learning Algorithm for Personalized Medicine.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Emerging Applications of Deep Learning in Bone Tumors: Current Advances and Challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Radiomics for Identification and Prediction in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Review of Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we formulated an efficient deep learning-based classification strategy for characterizing metastatic bone lesions using computed tomography scans (CTs) of prostate cancer patients. For this purpose, 2,880 annotated bone lesions from CT scans of 114 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were used for training, validation, and final evaluation. These annotations were in the form of lesion full segmentation, lesion type and labels of either benign or malignant. In this work, we present our approach in developing the state-of-the-art model to classify bone lesions as benign or malignant, where (1) we introduce a valuable dataset to address a clinically important problem, (2) we increase the reliability of our model by patient-level stratification of our dataset following lesion-aware distribution at each of the training, validation, and test splits, (3) we explore the impact of lesion texture, morphology, size, location, and volumetric information on the classification performance, (4) we investigate the functionality of lesion classification using different algorithms including lesion-based average 2D ResNet-50, lesion-based average 2D ResNeXt-50, 3D ResNet-18, 3D ResNet-50, as well as the ensemble of 2D ResNet-50 and 3D ResNet-18. For this purpose, we employed a train/validation/test split equal to 75%/12%/13% with several data augmentation methods applied to the training dataset to avoid overfitting and to increase reliability. We achieved an accuracy of 92.2% for correct classification of benign vs. malignant bone lesions in the test set using an ensemble of lesion-based average 2D ResNet-50 and 3D ResNet-18 with texture, volumetric information, and morphology having the greatest discriminative power respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest ever achieved lesion-level accuracy having a very comprehensive data set for such a clinically important problem. This level of classification performance in the early stages of metastasis development bodes well for clinical translation of this strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.