Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733543›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Developing and evaluating a team development intervention to support interdisciplinary teams.

Susan E Morgan, Alexandra Mosser, Soyeon Ahn, Tyler R Harrison, Jue Wang, Qian Huang, Ashley Reynolds, Bingjing Mao, John L Bixby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan E MorganCommunication Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Alexandra MosserOffice of the Vice Provost for Research, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Soyeon AhnEducational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Tyler R HarrisonCommunication Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Jue WangEducational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Qian HuangSchool of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-5552
Ashley ReynoldsSchool of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Bingjing MaoSchool of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
John L BixbyMolecular and Cellular Pharmacology; Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncentivizing the development of interdisciplinary scientific teams to address significant societal challenges usually takes the form of pilot funding. However, while pilot funding is likely necessary, it is not sufficient for successful collaborations. Interdisciplinary collaborations are enhanced when team members acquire competencies that support team success.

methodsWe evaluated the impact of a multifaceted team development intervention that included an eight-session workshop spanning two half-days. The workshop employed multiple methods for team development, including lectures on empirically supported best practices, skills-based modules, role plays, hands-on planning sessions, and social interaction within and across teams. We evaluated the impact of the intervention by (1) asking participants to assess each of the workshop sessions and (2) by completing a pre/postquestionnaire that included variables such as readiness to collaborate, goal clarity, process clarity, role ambiguity, and behavioral trust.

resultsThe content of the team development intervention was very well received, particularly the workshop session focused on psychological safety. Comparison of survey scores before and after the team development intervention indicated that scores on readiness to collaborate and behavioral trust were significantly higher among participants who attended the workshop. Goal clarity, process clarity, and role ambiguity did not differ among those who attended versus those who did not.

conclusionsMulticomponent team development interventions that focus on key competencies required for interdisciplinary teams can support attitudes and cognitions that the literature on the science of team science indicate are predictive of success. We offer recommendations for the design of future interventions.

Indexed as

interdisciplinary teamsteam developmentTeam scienceworkshop evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34733543
PMCPMC8532188
OpenAlexW3189917687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.