Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733539›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2021

Mainstreaming Genetic Testing for Adult Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Mark D Elliott, Leslie C James, Emily L Simms, Priyana Sharma, Louis P Girard, Kim Cheema, Meghan J Elliott, Julie L Lauzon, Justin Chun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Genetic Testing in Adult CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark D ElliottDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Leslie C JamesDepartment of Medical Genetics, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Emily L SimmsDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Priyana SharmaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Louis P GirardDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kim CheemaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meghan J ElliottDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-2917
Julie L LauzonDepartment of Medical Genetics, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Justin ChunDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-7192
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenetic testing results are currently obtained approximately 1 year after referral to a medical genetics team for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). We evaluated a mainstream genetic testing (MGT) pathway whereby the nephrology team provided pre-test counseling and selection of patients with suspected ADPKD for genetic testing prior to direct patient interaction by a medical geneticist. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: A multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, genetic counselors, and medical geneticists developed an MGT pathway for ADPKD using current testing criteria for adult patient with suspected ADPKD and literature from MGT in oncology.

methodsAn MGT pathway was assessed using a prospective cohort and compared to a retrospective cohort of 56 patients with ADPKD who received genetic testing using the standard, traditional pathway prior to implementing the MGT for ADPKD. The mainstream pathway was evaluated using time to diagnosis, diagnostic yield, and a patient survey to assess patient perceptions of the MGT pathway. KEY

findingsWe assessed 26 patients with ADPKD using the MGT and 18 underwent genetic testing with return of results. Of them, 52 patients had data available for analysis in the traditional control cohort. The time for return of results using our MGT pathway was significantly shorter with a median time to results of 6 months compared to 12 months for the traditional pathway. We identified causative variants in 61% of patients, variants of uncertain significance in 28%, and 10% had negative testing which is in line with expectations from the literature. The patient surveys showed high satisfaction rates with the MGT pathway. LIMITATIONS: This report is an evaluation of a new genetic testing pathway restricted to a single, publicly funded health care center. The MGT pathway involved a prospective collection of a limited number of patients with ADPKD with comparison to a retrospective cohort of patients with ADPKD evaluated by standard testing. IMPLICATIONS: A MGT pathway using clearly defined criteria and commercially available gene panels for ADPKD can be successfully implemented in a publicly funded health care system to reduce the time required to obtain genetic results.

Indexed as

autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)chronic kidney disease (CKD)genetic testingkidney failuremainstreammedical geneticsnext generation sequencing (NGS)

Identifiers

PMID34733539
PMCPMC8558595
OpenAlexW3208166896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.