ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2021
Mainstreaming Genetic Testing for Adult Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scoping Review of Global Kidney Genetics Clinic Models and Outcomes.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Molecular genetic diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease - A systematic review.Global medical genetics · 2026Review
- Integrating paediatric subspecialists into the delivery of genomic medicine: A qualitative study.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Results of Multigene Panel Testing, IncludingKidney medicine · 2026Article
- Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: an overview of recent genetic and clinical advances.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Genomic sequencing technologies for rare disease in mainstream healthcare: the current state of implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Design, implementation and evaluation of a model of care for patients with germline predisposition to haematological malignancy and bone marrow failure syndromes.Internal medicine journal · 2025Article
- The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and genomic tests for the diagnosis of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: a systematic mapping review.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Clinical genetic services in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy: current activity and open issues: a mixed-method study.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring new gene-disease associations in polycystic kidney disease: a case report highlighting the importance of a precise genomic diagnosis.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Framework for standardized genetic testing recommendations for chronic kidney disease in Ontario.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a National Multidisciplinary Kidney Genetics Clinic Network Over 10 Years.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Genetic Testing in Adult CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024Article
- Exploring the impact and utility of genomic sequencing in established CKD.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Review
- The future is mainstream: genetic counselling should be embedded in mainstream medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Co-Inheritance of Pathogenic Variants inGenes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGenetic testing results are currently obtained approximately 1 year after referral to a medical genetics team for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). We evaluated a mainstream genetic testing (MGT) pathway whereby the nephrology team provided pre-test counseling and selection of patients with suspected ADPKD for genetic testing prior to direct patient interaction by a medical geneticist. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: A multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, genetic counselors, and medical geneticists developed an MGT pathway for ADPKD using current testing criteria for adult patient with suspected ADPKD and literature from MGT in oncology.
methodsAn MGT pathway was assessed using a prospective cohort and compared to a retrospective cohort of 56 patients with ADPKD who received genetic testing using the standard, traditional pathway prior to implementing the MGT for ADPKD. The mainstream pathway was evaluated using time to diagnosis, diagnostic yield, and a patient survey to assess patient perceptions of the MGT pathway. KEY
findingsWe assessed 26 patients with ADPKD using the MGT and 18 underwent genetic testing with return of results. Of them, 52 patients had data available for analysis in the traditional control cohort. The time for return of results using our MGT pathway was significantly shorter with a median time to results of 6 months compared to 12 months for the traditional pathway. We identified causative variants in 61% of patients, variants of uncertain significance in 28%, and 10% had negative testing which is in line with expectations from the literature. The patient surveys showed high satisfaction rates with the MGT pathway. LIMITATIONS: This report is an evaluation of a new genetic testing pathway restricted to a single, publicly funded health care center. The MGT pathway involved a prospective collection of a limited number of patients with ADPKD with comparison to a retrospective cohort of patients with ADPKD evaluated by standard testing. IMPLICATIONS: A MGT pathway using clearly defined criteria and commercially available gene panels for ADPKD can be successfully implemented in a publicly funded health care system to reduce the time required to obtain genetic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.