Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733492›Full record

ReviewPulmonary circulation

Serious illness conversations in pulmonary hypertension.

Reem Ismail, Sara Hegab, Bryan Kelly, Domingo J Franco-Palacios, Gillian Grafton, Zachary R Smith, Rana L A Awdish

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reem IsmailDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Sara HegabDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Bryan KellyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Domingo J Franco-PalaciosDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-6744
Gillian GraftonAdvanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology, CICU, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Zachary R SmithDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Rana L A AwdishDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-7563
Henry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension has evolved from a fatal disease with few treatment options to a chronic condition with improved survival. This improvement is possible through development of effective therapies as well as the expansion of risk stratification scores to assist clinical decision making. Despite improved disease control, quality of life, and overall prognosis, many challenges remain. The treatment itself is burdensome, with significant impact on quality of life. Many patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension still present with advanced, often end-stage disease. Increased use of mechanical circulatory support and catheter-based interventions have expanded use of extracorporeal life support and right ventricle assist devices. For these reasons as well as the long-term relationships pulmonary hypertension physicians have with patients and their families, navigating the course of the illness in a considered, proactive way is essential. Understanding individual goals and revisiting them as they change over time requires comfort with the conversation itself. There are many barriers and challenges to having effective, compassionate conversations in the clinical setting with time constraints being the most often cited. Compressed visits are necessarily focused on the clinical aspects, therapy and medication adherence and tolerance. Clinicians are sometimes wary of diminishing hope in the face of ongoing treatment. Having sufficient experience and comfort with these discussions can be empowering. In this paper, we discuss the challenges involved and propose a framework to assist in incorporating these discussions into clinical care.

Indexed as

communicationgoals of carequality of lifeserious newsvalues-concordant care

Identifiers

PMID34733492
PMCPMC8558806
OpenAlexW3190163672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.