Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733116›Full record

ArticleBioscience2021

Destroying and Restoring Critical Habitats of Endangered Killer Whales.

Rob Williams, Erin Ashe, Ginny Broadhurst, Michael Jasny, Dyna Tuytel, Margot Venton, Tim Ragen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rob WilliamsOceans Initiative, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-453X
Erin AsheOceans Initiative, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Ginny BroadhurstSalish Sea Institute, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, United States.
Michael JasnyNatural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC, United States.
Dyna TuytelEcojustice, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Margot VentonEcojustice, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tim RagenUS Marine Mammal Commission, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endangered species legislation in the United States and Canada aims to prevent extinction of species, in part by designating and protecting critical habitats essential to ensure survival and recovery. These strict laws prohibit adverse modification or destruction of critical habitat, respectively. Defining thresholds for such effects is challenging, especially for wholly aquatic taxa. Destruction of critical habitat (e.g., prey reduction and ocean noise) threatens the survival and recovery of the 75 members of the endangered southern resident killer whale population found in transboundary (Canada-United States) Pacific waters. The population's dynamics are now driven largely by the cumulative effects of prey limitation (e.g., the endangered Chinook salmon), anthropogenic noise and disturbance (e.g., reducing prey accessibility), and toxic contaminants, which are all forms of habitat degradation. It is difficult to define a single threshold beyond which habitat degradation becomes destruction, but multiple lines of evidence suggest that line may have been crossed already.

Indexed as

Endangered Species Actenvironmental lawhabitat degradationSpecies At Risk Actsustainability

Identifiers

PMID34733116
PMCPMC8560306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.