Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34733100›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of evaluation2020

A Process for Identifying Indicators With Public Data: An Example From Sexual Violence Prevention.

Marissa McKool, Kimberley Freire, Kathleen C Basile, Kathryn M Jones, Joanne Klevens, Sarah DeGue, Sharon G Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of evaluation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marissa McKoolDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kimberley FreireDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-5733
Kathleen C BasileDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kathryn M JonesDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joanne KlevensDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sarah DeGueDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sharon G SmithDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in the sexual violence (SV) prevention field, practitioners still face challenges with identifying indicators to measure the impact of their prevention strategies. Public data, such as existing administrative and surveillance system data, may be a good option for organizations to examine trends in indicators for the purpose of program evaluation. In this article, we describe a framework and a process for identifying indicators with public data. Specifically, we present the SV Indicator Framework and a five-step indicator review process, which we used to identify indicators for a national SV prevention program. We present the findings of the indicator review and explain how the process could be used by evaluators and program planners within other developing topic areas. Tracking indicators with public data, in conjunction with other evaluation methods, may be a viable option for state-level program evaluations. We discuss limitations and implications for practice and research.

Indexed as

capacity-buildingevaluation practiceindicatorsmeasurement (goal attainment)performanceprogram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34733100
PMCPMC8563011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.