ReviewAnnals of neurosciences2021
A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison.
Review in Annals of neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- An AI-integrated organoid platform enables high-throughput functional evaluation of bioactive metal ions.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Redefining Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using AI-Driven Brain Volumetry.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Precision of automatically generated generic regions of interest for direct assessment of perfusion-MRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Inverse Association of Locus Coeruleus MRI Integrity With Structural Volume and Its Impact on Individual's Inattentiveness.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- A computational ontology framework for the synthesis of multi-level pathology reports from brain MRI scans.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A FastSurfer Database for Age-Specific Brain Volumes in Healthy Children: A Tool for Quantifying Localized and Global Brain Volume Alterations in Pediatric Patients.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Spiking Neural Networks for Multimodal Neuroimaging: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends and the NeuCube Brain-Inspired Architecture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Changes in the Relationship Between Gray Matter, Functional Parameters, and Quality of Life in Patients with a Post-Stroke Spastic Upper Limb After Single-Event Multilevel Surgery: Six-Month Results from a Randomized Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Case for Automated Segmentation of MRI Data in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Type II GM1 Gangliosidosis.NeuroSci · 2025Article
- Selective correlation of hippocampal volumes with WADA memory scores in mesial temporal sclerosis patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Semi-supervised synthesis of 7T MRI from 3T using 3D FR-U-Net with anatomical segmentation consistency assessment.PloS one · 2025Article
- GOUHFI: A novel contrast- and resolution-agnostic segmentation tool for ultra-high-field MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Comparing automated subcortical volume estimation methods; amygdala volumes estimated by FSL and FreeSurfer have poor consistency.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Evaluation of registration-based vs. manual segmentation of rhesus macaque brain MRIs.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Comparing Automated Subcortical Volume Estimation Methods; Amygdala Volumes Estimated by FSL and FreeSurfer Have Poor Consistency.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Hippocampal volume changes after (R,S)-ketamine administration in patients with major depressive disorder and healthy volunteers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hippocampal Structures Among Japanese Adolescents Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Automated brain segmentation and volumetry in dementia diagnostics: a narrative review with emphasis on FreeSurfer.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe noninvasive study of the structure and functions of the brain using neuroimaging techniques is increasingly being used for its clinical and research perspective. The morphological and volumetric changes in several regions and structures of brains are associated with the prognosis of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, schizophrenia, etc. and the early identification of such changes can have huge clinical significance. The accurate segmentation of three-dimensional brain magnetic resonance images into tissue types (i.e., grey matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid) and brain structures, thus, has huge importance as they can act as early biomarkers. The manual segmentation though considered the "gold standard" is time-consuming, subjective, and not suitable for bigger neuroimaging studies. Several automatic segmentation tools and algorithms have been developed over the years; the machine learning models particularly those using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture are increasingly being applied to improve the accuracy of automatic methods. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to understand the current and emerging state of automatic segmentation tools, their comparison, machine learning models, their reliability, and shortcomings with an intent to focus on the development of improved methods and algorithms.
methodsThe study focuses on the review of publicly available neuroimaging tools, their comparison, and emerging machine learning models particularly those based on CNN architecture developed and published during the last five years.
conclusionSeveral software tools developed by various research groups and made publicly available for automatic segmentation of the brain show variability in their results in several comparison studies and have not attained the level of reliability required for clinical studies. The machine learning models particularly three dimensional fully convolutional network models can provide a robust and efficient alternative with relation to publicly available tools but perform poorly on unseen datasets. The challenges related to training, computation cost, reproducibility, and validation across distinct scanning modalities for machine learning models need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.