Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732956›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2021

Civil responsibility in Geriatric Psychiatry.

Bhavika Vajawat, Prakyath R Hegde, Prateek Varshney, Barikar C Malathesh, Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar, Suresh Bada Math

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhavika VajawatDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-0849
Prakyath R HegdeDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-6824
Prateek VarshneyDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-5879
Barikar C MalatheshDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-1717
Channaveerachari Naveen KumarDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Suresh Bada MathDept. of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health issues impair decision-making capacity, more so in elderly people. Impaired decision-making capacity can make person unfit to enter into various civil deeds and agreements. Such civil deeds can include guardianship, property transaction, holding a bank account, having voting rights, making a will, donating an organ, etc. This article focuses on importance of mental health in entering into above-mentioned civil agreements, how to do assessments to determine if one is fit to enter into civil agreements, and what are the legal ways in which a person can avail help to execute his/her civil rights even when affected by mental health issues.

Indexed as

Guardianshipright to legal aidtestamentary capacityvoting

Identifiers

PMID34732956
PMCPMC8543617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.