Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732736›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Optimally-weighted non-linear beamformer for conventional focused beam ultrasound imaging systems.

Anudeep Vayyeti, Arun K Thittai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anudeep VayyetiBiomedical Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India.
Arun K ThittaiBiomedical Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India. akthittai@iitm.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel non-linear beamforming method, namely, filtered delay optimally-weighted multiply and sum (F-DowMAS) beamforming is reported for conventional focused beamforming (CFB) technique. The performance of F-DowMAS was compared against delay and sum (DAS), filtered delay multiply and sum (F-DMAS), filtered delay weight multiply and sum (F-DwMAS) and filter delay Euclidian weighted multiply and sum (F-DewMAS) methods. Notably, in the proposed method the optimal adaptive weights are computed for each imaging point to compensate for the effects due to spatial variations in beam pattern in CFB technique. F-DowMAS, F-DMAS, and DAS were compared in terms of the resulting image quality metrics, Lateral resolution (LR), axial resolution (AR), contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), estimated from experiments on a commercially available tissue-mimicking phantom. The results demonstrate that F-DowMAS improved the AR by 57.04% and 46.95%, LR by 58.21% and 53.40%, CR by 67.35% and 39.25%, and CNR by 44.04% and 30.57% compared to those obtained using DAS and F-DMAS, respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that the newly proposed F-DowMAS outperforms DAS and F-DMAS. As an aside, we also show that the optimal weighting strategy can be extended to benefit DAS.

Identifiers

PMID34732736
PMCPMC8566575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.