Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732712›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Computational design and optimization of electro-physiological sensors.

Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Andreas Karrenbauer, Arshad Khan, Tobias Kraus, Jürgen Steimle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aditya Shekhar NittalaHuman Computer Interaction Lab, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany. nittalaa@acm.org.
Andreas KarrenbauerMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6129-3220
Arshad KhanHuman Computer Interaction Lab, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Tobias KrausINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany. tobias.kraus@leibniz-inm.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2951-1704
Jürgen SteimleHuman Computer Interaction Lab, Saarland University, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany. steimle@cs.uni-saarland.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-8745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electro-physiological sensing devices are becoming increasingly common in diverse applications. However, designing such sensors in compact form factors and for high-quality signal acquisition is a challenging task even for experts, is typically done using heuristics, and requires extensive training. Our work proposes a computational approach for designing multi-modal electro-physiological sensors. By employing an optimization-based approach alongside an integrated predictive model for multiple modalities, compact sensors can be created which offer an optimal trade-off between high signal quality and small device size. The task is assisted by a graphical tool that allows to easily specify design preferences and to visually analyze the generated designs in real-time, enabling designer-in-the-loop optimization. Experimental results show high quantitative agreement between the prediction of the optimizer and experimentally collected physiological data. They demonstrate that generated designs can achieve an optimal balance between the size of the sensor and its signal acquisition capability, outperforming expert generated solutions.

Indexed as

Biomedical EngineeringComputational BiologyHeuristicsAlgorithmsElectrodesElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansSoftwareWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID34732712
PMCPMC8566494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.