Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2022
Effect of Robot-assisted Rehabilitation to Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Upper Limb Disability in Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Case Series and Systematic Review.
Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the correlation between training modalities and recovery stages in poststroke robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted upper limb therapy for personalized rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Research progress in the use of botulinum toxin type a for post-stroke spasticity rehabilitation: a narrative review.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Is the Combination of Robot-Assisted Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Useful for Upper Limb Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combining single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ) with botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) therapy is novel and has great therapeutic potential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients with upper limb paralysis. The purpose of this observational case series study was to evaluate the effect of BTX-A and HAL-SJ combination therapy on different exoskeleton robots used for treating upper limb paralysis. The HAL-SJ combination received a BTX-A injection followed by HAL-SJ-assisted rehabilitation for 60 min per session, 10 times per week, during 2 weeks of hospitalization. Clinical evaluations to assess motor function, limb functions used during daily activities, and spasticity were performed prior to injection, at 2-week post-treatment intervention, and at the 4-month follow-up visit. The total Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper limb (FMA-UE), proximal FMA-UE, action research arm test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) showed a statistically significant difference, and a large effect size. However, the FMA distal assessment at 2-week post-treatment intervention showed no significant difference and a moderate effect size. The FMA-UE scores of the extracted systematic review articles showed that our design improved upper limb function. The change in the total FMA-UE score in this study showed that, compared to previous reports in the exoskeletal robotic therapy group, our combination therapy had a higher score than five of the seven references. Our results suggest that BTX-A therapy and HAL-SJ combination therapy may improve upper limb function, similar to other treatment methods in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.