Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732519›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Neural Markers of Speech Comprehension: Measuring EEG Tracking of Linguistic Speech Representations, Controlling the Speech Acoustics.

Marlies Gillis, Jonas Vanthornhout, Jonathan Z Simon, Tom Francart, Christian Brodbeck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Accent type modulates frequency-specific neural tracking of speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Attentional Engagement with Target and Distractor Streams Predicts Speech Comprehension in Multitalker Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neural Dynamics of the Processing of Speech Features: Evidence for a Progression of Features from Acoustic to Sentential Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marlies GillisExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium marlies.gillis@kuleuven.be tom.francart@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3967-2950
Jonas VanthornhoutExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-599X
Jonathan Z SimonDepartments of Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Biology, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20740.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-0698
Tom FrancartExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium marlies.gillis@kuleuven.be tom.francart@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-4261
Christian BrodbeckDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269.ORCID 0000-0001-8380-639X
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Auditory Scene Analysis and Temporal Cortical ComputationsR01DC014085 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, JONATHAN Z. · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When listening to speech, our brain responses time lock to acoustic events in the stimulus. Recent studies have also reported that cortical responses track linguistic representations of speech. However, tracking of these representations is often described without controlling for acoustic properties. Therefore, the response to these linguistic representations might reflect unaccounted acoustic processing rather than language processing. Here, we evaluated the potential of several recently proposed linguistic representations as neural markers of speech comprehension. To do so, we investigated EEG responses to audiobook speech of 29 participants (22 females). We examined whether these representations contribute unique information over and beyond acoustic neural tracking and each other. Indeed, not all of these linguistic representations were significantly tracked after controlling for acoustic properties. However, phoneme surprisal, cohort entropy, word surprisal, and word frequency were all significantly tracked over and beyond acoustic properties. We also tested the generality of the associated responses by training on one story and testing on another. In general, the linguistic representations are tracked similarly across different stories spoken by different readers. These results suggests that these representations characterize the processing of the linguistic content of speech.

Indexed as

LinguisticsSpeech AcousticsComprehensionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID34732519
PMCPMC8672699
OpenAlexW3209125028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.