ArticleBMJ open2021
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of health workers' migration, intention to migrate and non-migration from low/middle-income countries, 1970-2022: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2023Pooled it
- Assessing health system readiness for reconstruction in post-conflict Damascus Governorate, Syria: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Birth in shelters: Midwives' lived experiences in providing childbirth care amidst war in Gaza.PloS one · 2026Article
- Translation, cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the postgraduate hospital educational environment measure into Arabic.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The impact of humanitarian aid on financial toxicity among cancer patients in Northwest Syria.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Impacts of attacks to female health care workers in three territories of Colombia.Conflict and health · 2024Article
- Echoes of conflict: the enduring mental health struggle of Gaza's healthcare workers.Conflict and health · 2024Article
- Evaluating a research training programme for frontline health workers in conflict-affected and fragile settings in the middle east.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Revealing the significant shortcomings in the learning environment at the three largest medical schools in Syria: what's next?BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Human Resources for Health in Conflict Affected Settings: A Scoping Review of Primary Peer Reviewed Publications 2016-2022.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- 'We will never give up': a qualitative study of ethical challenges Syrian health workers face in situations of extreme violence.Disasters · 2022Article
- I don't leave my people; They need me: Qualitative research of local health care professionals' working motivations in Syria.Conflict and health · 2022Article
- Learning from the experiences of midwifery students and recent graduates in humanitarian and conflict-affected settings: A prospective cohort study protocol.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the reasons why healthcare workers migrate from Syria, a country where conflict has been raging for over a decade.
designA qualitative study was performed using semistructured interviews. Semistructured questions guided in-depth interviews. Content analysis was used.
settingParticipants were Syrian healthcare workers who had worked in the country after the conflict started in 2011, but at some point left Syria and settled abroad. The interviews took place in Turkey and Europe in 2016 and 2017.
participantsWe collected data from 20 participants (18 males and 2 females) through snowball sampling method.
resultsHealthcare workers migrated from Syria only because of security reasons. In most cases, the decision to leave resulted from the generalised violence against civilians by different warring parties, mainly the Government of Syria and the Islamic State. Intentional attacks against healthcare workers were also one of the main reasons for leaving. Some participants had a specific notable trigger event before leaving, such as colleagues being detained or killed. Many participants simply grew tired of living under constant fear, with their families also at risk.
conclusionsThis research adds to the body of literature on violence against healthcare workers in Syria. It helps to understand the reasons why healthcare workers leave the country. The study also indicates that the international community has failed to protect Syrian healthcare workers. The intensity of the conflict has left many healthcare workers with no other option than to leave. Understanding this migration will enable the discovery of new solutions for protecting healthcare workers in current and future conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.