Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732226›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Yu Mu, Linxian Zhao, Hongyu He, Huimin Zhao, Jiannan Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu Mu *Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China.
Linxian Zhao *Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China.
Hongyu HeOperating Theater and Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China.
Huimin ZhaoOperating Theater and Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China.
Jiannan LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China. jnli@ciac.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-7666

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 3A4205367429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtective ileostomy is always applied to avoid clinically significant anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications for patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether it is necessary to perform the ileostomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy of ileostomy on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

methodsCochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were applied for systematic search of all relevant literature, updated to May 07, 2021. Studies compared patients with and without ileostomy for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. We applied Review Manager software to perform this meta-analysis. The quality of the non-randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and the randomized studies were assessed using the Jadad scale.

resultsWe collected a total of 1203 references, and seven studies were included using the research methods. The clinically significant anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in ileostomy group (27/567, 4.76%) than that in non-ileostomy group (54/525, 10.29%) (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73, P for overall effect = 0.0009, P for heterogeneity = 0.18, I

conclusionThe results demonstrated that protective ileostomy could decrease the clinically significant anastomotic leakage rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, ileostomy has no effect on postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, wound infection, and operation time. The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansIleostomyPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisClinically significant anastomotic leakageIleostomyLaparoscopyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34732226
PMCPMC8567543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.