Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732198›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?

Valérie Lemieux, Soheil Afsharpour, Diane Nam, Amr Elmaraghy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06050473 (Preservation vs Sacrifice of the Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06050473 nacompletednot on this map

Preservation vs Sacrifice of the Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2016 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsClavicle FractureArmsNerve-sacrificing procedure, Nerve preserving procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valérie LemieuxDepartment of Surgery - Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada. valerie.lemieux@mail.utoronto.ca.
Soheil AfsharpourRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Diane NamDepartment of Surgery - Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
Amr ElmaraghyDepartment of Surgery - Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P5, Canada.
University of Toronto · CARoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures.

methodsEighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction.

resultsNinety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall.

conclusionsPost-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively.

Indexed as

ClavicleFractures, BoneBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansParesthesiaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIatrogenic supraclavicular nerve injuryNumbnessParesthesia

Identifiers

PMID34732198
PMCPMC8567600
OpenAlexW3209864276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.