Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34732136›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Transposable elements that have recently been mobile in the human genome.

Matias I Autio, Talal Bin Amin, Arnaud Perrin, Jen Yi Wong, Roger S-Y Foo, Shyam Prabhakar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transposons disrupt genomic stability and trigger cancers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matias I Autio *Laboratory of Epigenomics and Chromatin Organization, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Talal Bin Amin *Spatial and Single Cell Systems, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, 60 Biopolis St, Genome #02-01, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Arnaud PerrinLaboratory of Epigenomics and Chromatin Organization, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Jen Yi WongSpatial and Single Cell Systems, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, 60 Biopolis St, Genome #02-01, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Roger S-Y FooLaboratory of Epigenomics and Chromatin Organization, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Shyam PrabhakarSpatial and Single Cell Systems, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, 60 Biopolis St, Genome #02-01, Singapore, 138672, Singapore. prabhakars@gis.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-0661
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

National Research Foundation Singapore NRF2013-THE001-093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransposable elements (TE) comprise nearly half of the human genome and their insertions have profound effects to human genetic diversification and as well as disease. Despite their abovementioned significance, there is no consensus on the TE subfamilies that remain active in the human genome. In this study, we therefore developed a novel statistical test for recently mobile subfamilies (RMSs), based on patterns of overlap with > 100,000 polymorphic indels.

resultsOur analysis produced a catalogue of 20 high-confidence RMSs, which excludes many false positives in public databases. Intriguingly though, it includes HERV-K, an LTR subfamily previously thought to be extinct. The RMS catalogue is strongly enriched for contributions to germline genetic disorders (P = 1.1e-10), and thus constitutes a valuable resource for diagnosing disorders of unknown aetiology using targeted TE-insertion screens. Remarkably, RMSs are also highly enriched for somatic insertions in diverse cancers (P = 2.8e-17), thus indicating strong correlations between germline and somatic TE mobility. Using CRISPR/Cas9 deletion, we show that an RMS-derived polymorphic TE insertion increased the expression of RPL17, a gene associated with lower survival in liver cancer. More broadly, polymorphic TE insertions from RMSs were enriched near genes with allele-specific expression, suggesting widespread effects on gene regulation.

conclusionsBy using a novel statistical test we have defined a catalogue of 20 recently mobile transposable element subfamilies. We illustrate the gene regulatory potential of RMS-derived polymorphic TE insertions, using CRISPR/Cas9 deletion in vitro on a specific candidate, as well as by genome wide analysis of allele-specific expression. Our study presents novel insights into TE mobility and regulatory potential and provides a key resource for human disease genetics and population history studies.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEndogenous RetrovirusesGene Expression RegulationGenome, HumanHumansDNA Transposable ElementsHumanInsertionMobile elementPolymorphismTransposable element

Identifiers

PMID34732136
PMCPMC8567694
OpenAlexW3210257813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.