ArticleIntervirology2022
Real-World Single-Center Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.
Article in Intervirology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06990438 (Effect of Long-Term Use of Tenofovir), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Long-Term Use of Tenofovir (TDF) on Bone Density in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of TDF, TAF, TMF, and TDF-to-TAF switch in chronic hepatitis B: a network meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of dyslipidemia in chronic hepatitis B patients taking tenofovir alafenamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hepatology international · 2023Pooled it
- Review Article: Renal Safety Profiles of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection-General and Special Populations.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Monitoring Adherence and Renal Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate in Treating Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure with Hepatitis B Virus: A Network Meta-analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir on renal function and serum lipids in liver transplant recipients: a controlled retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Interim Analysis of 48-week Tenofovir Amibufenamide Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Normal Alanine Aminotransferase Levels: The PROMOTE Study.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamideantiviral Therapy on Renal Function in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-World Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Virological and Biochemical Effects of Tenofovir Alafenamide in Different Patient Groups With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Real-World Cohort.International journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of lipid profile alterations in chronic hepatitis b patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in patients with chronic Hepatitis-B.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Clinical effectiveness of entecavir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in chronic hepatitis B treatment.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting suboptimal response to entecavir.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Renal and bone side effects of long-term use of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in patients with Hepatitis B: a network meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major cause of chronic liver diseases and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and entecavir (ETV) are recommended as primary treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ETV, TDF, and TAF in a real-world clinical setting.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, a total of 363 CHB patients who were treated with ETV (n = 163), TDF (n = 154), or TAF (n = 46) from July 2007 to September 2019 were enrolled.
resultsMedian patient age was 51 years and 66.4% of patients were male. Median duration of treatment with ETV, TDF, or TAF was 49.0 months (interquartile range, 27.0-74.0 months). In terms of safety, cholesterol was mildly increased in the ETV and TAF groups and significantly lowered in the TDF group than baseline (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in liver cirrhosis-related complications among the 3 groups at 48 weeks (p = 0.235). Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, complete virological response, and alanine aminotransferase normalization at 48 weeks as measures of treatment efficacy were not significantly different among the 3 groups (p = 0.142, 0.538, and 0.520, respectively). There was also no significant difference in cumulative incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between the ETV and TDF groups (p = 0.894).
conclusionsETV, TDF, and TAF were safe antiviral agents and showed similar antiviral effect for CHB at 48 weeks. Cirrhosis-related complications and annual HCC incidence rates did not differ significantly between the ETV and TDF groups over the 48 week follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.