Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731478›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Real-Life Drug Design Cases.

Christophe Muller, Obdulia Rabal, Constantino Diaz Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Accelerating COVID-19 Drug Discovery with High-Performance Computing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Molecular Dynamics and Other HPC Simulations for Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep learning in prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christophe MullerEvotec (France) SAS, Computational Drug Discovery, Integrated Drug Discovery, Toulouse, France.
Obdulia RabalEvotec (France) SAS, Computational Drug Discovery, Integrated Drug Discovery, Toulouse, France.
Constantino Diaz GonzalezEvotec (France) SAS, Computational Drug Discovery, Integrated Drug Discovery, Toulouse, France. Constantino.Diaz@evotec.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery and development of drugs is a long and expensive process with a high attrition rate. Computational drug discovery contributes to ligand discovery and optimization, by using models that describe the properties of ligands and their interactions with biological targets. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made remarkable modeling progress, driven by new algorithms and by the increase in computing power and storage capacities, which allow the processing of large amounts of data in a short time. This review provides the current state of the art of AI methods applied to drug discovery, with a focus on structure- and ligand-based virtual screening, library design and high-throughput analysis, drug repurposing and drug sensitivity, de novo design, chemical reactions and synthetic accessibility, ADMET, and quantum mechanics.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningDrug DesignLigandsMachine LearningLigandsADMETArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDe novo designDrug designDrug discoveryDrug repurposingDrug sensitivityHTSLibrary designLigand-based virtual screeningMachine learningQSARQuantum mechanicsStructure-based virtual screeningSynthesis planning

Identifiers

PMID34731478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.