Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731378›Full record

ArticleDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2021

Theoretical Reproductive Outcomes of the Sexual Conflict in Humans.

O V Semenova, M L Butovskaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O V SemenovaMiklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia. m4248296@yandex.ru.
M L ButovskayaMiklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an updated mathematical model of the evolutionary dynamics of the sexual conflict ("battle of the sexes") and its simulated reproductive outcomes. The authors highlight a whole range of life-history traits unique to our species, such as prolonged childhood, growth in parental care, etc. Based on these biosocial premises, the sexual conflict between men and women shifts into the mathematical realm of the "Prisoner's Dilemma" game. The evolutionarily stable strategy of mutual rejection of parenthood would be dominant with this PD strategy in both parents; oscillation dynamics predicted in previous models would not be expected. Despite fatal theoretical prediction of the PD evolutionary game, the newish genetic data of the EPP rates in the historical populations reveals prevalence of cooperation between both sexes, predominantly utilizing the monogamous form of sexuality. Presumably, this sexual norm could have potentially ensured reproductive success in the societies in the past.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGame TheoryBiological EvolutionChildFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalReproductionbattle of sexesdemographygame theoryhuman reproductionmonogamyparental careprisoner’s dilemmasexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID34731378
OpenAlexW3209171678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.