Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731325›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2021

Development of a 3D Motion Tracking System for the Analysis of Skills in Microsurgery.

Iván Tlacaélel Franco-González, Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa, Arturo Minor-Martínez, José Vicente Rosas-Barrientos, Tania Josefina Hernández-Paredes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iván Tlacaélel Franco-GonzálezSección de Bioelectrónica, Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Ciudad de México, México. ivan.franco@cinvestav.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-862X
Fernando Pérez-EscamirosaInstituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología (ICAT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7886-8692
Arturo Minor-MartínezSección de Bioelectrónica, Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5365-5957
José Vicente Rosas-BarrientosHospital Regional 1º de Octubre del ISSSTE, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 1669, Col. Magdalena de las Salinas, 07760, Ciudad de México, México.
Tania Josefina Hernández-ParedesHospital Regional 1º de Octubre del ISSSTE, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 1669, Col. Magdalena de las Salinas, 07760, Ciudad de México, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgical skills of trainee surgeons have been subjectively evaluated due to the lack of technological tools. The objective of this investigation is to present the construct validity of the mitracks3D, which is a system designed to help in the objective evaluation of microsurgery trainees. To achieve this, a stereoscopic vision system records the 3D motion of two tweezers manipulated by surgeons during microsurgery training. Using motion analysis parameters (MAPs), quantitative information about their microsurgical skills and performance is obtained. For validation, 14 participants were enrolled and divided into two groups: expert microsurgeons (3 female, 2 male) and trainee surgeons (4 female, 5 male). The 3D motion tracking was acquired while the surgeons practiced with two training models: transferring objects and suture. Twelve MAPs were used to objective assessment the skill levels of each participant. Subsequent, statistical analysis was computed to compare the scores of both groups. Validation results showed statistically significant differences in 8 of the 12 MAPs and in 10 of the 12 MAPs using the transferring and the suturing models, respectively. The capability of mitracks3D to differentiate the performance of microsurgeons by analyzing their movements was shown. The mitracks3D system was successfully validated. With this system was possible to differentiate the psychomotor microsurgical skills between the two groups of surgeons. The mitracks3D system is a suitable device for the evaluation of microsurgical skills in a variety of surgical specialties that require it during the training of their residents.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMicrosurgeryDepth PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMicrosurgeryMicrosurgical assessmentMitracks3DStereoscopic cameras systemValidationVideo motion analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.