Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34731292›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Early childhood intervention from a distance-opportunities and challenges in supporting psychosocially stressed families in the COVID-19 pandemic].

Ilona Renner, Juliane van Staa, Anna Neumann, Frank Sinß, Mechthild Paul

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [The relevance of early childhood intervention in times of social challenges and crises].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilona RennerNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland. ilona.renner@nzfh.de.
Juliane van StaaNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Anna NeumannNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Frank SinßNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Mechthild PaulNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland.
Federal Centre for Health Education · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of spring 2020, contact-restricting measures were necessary to contain the incidence of infection with the SARS-CoV‑2 virus in Germany. However, these restrictions posed particular challenges to families, especially families in high-stress situations. This paper examines how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the life of families and if long-term support in the context of early childhood intervention could be continued. The following analyses are based on qualitative research with psychosocially stressed mothers of young children, two surveys of health professionals who provide long-term support to families in early childhood intervention, and a survey of municipal actors who are responsible for the management and implementation of early childhood intervention in German communities.During the pandemic, families in high-stress conditions report existential fears and general overstrain. Intrafamilial conflicts seem to increase. Home visits in the context of long-term psychosocial support were initially primarily replaced by phone calls, video calls or other forms of "support from a distance." During the course of the pandemic, many professionals have begun conducting home visiting again, but several elements of support from a distance continue to be used as a supplement.Due to the pandemic-related additional burdens on the families who were accompanied by early childhood intervention, the continuation of support was even more important than it already was. Having been tested by necessity during the pandemic, several formats of support from a distance may have the potential to complement the usual assistance provided by health professionals in early childhood intervention and thus contribute to its quality development push.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsChildChild, PreschoolGermanyHouse CallsHumansSARS-CoV-2Care conceptEarly childhood interventionHealth professionalsPandemicQuality developmentVulnerable families

Identifiers

PMID34731292
PMCPMC8564272
OpenAlexW3209402019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.