ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Congenital musculoskeletal anomalies - key radiographic findings.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of Alagille syndrome: uncovering the potential of emerging therapeutics - a comprehensive systematic literature review.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary Approach in Management of Currarino Syndrome in a Female Infant: A Case Report on Rare Congenital Triad and Focused Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- The Significance and Limitations of Pre- and Postnatal Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Proximal Focal Femoral Deficiency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Increasing Prevalence and High Risk of Associated Anomalies in Congenital Vertebral Defects: A Population-based Study.Journal of pediatric orthopedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although radiographs are generally performed in the neonatal period to evaluate for causes of respiratory distress or to evaluate line placement, close attention to the osseous structures can provide important clues to an underlying diagnosis. Although segmentation anomalies can be random, they are frequently associated with more complex entities such as VACTERL association. A butterfly vertebral body can hint at a possible diagnosis of Alagille syndrome even before jaundice develops in an infant with a murmur. Close evaluation of the sacrum can identify abnormalities that point to caudal regression or Currarino triad. Other classic musculoskeletal abnormalities in the extremities are readily apparent on physical exam but require radiographic evaluation to define anatomy. Diagnoses such as congenital pseudoarthrosis of the clavicle, Apert syndrome, constriction band syndrome, and proximal focal femoral deficiency have pathognomonic imaging findings. Given that treatment for these is usually delayed until later in life, extremity imaging might not occur in the neonatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.